Do I Look Like a Criminal? Examining how Race Presentation Impacts Human Judgement of Recidivism
Keri Mallari, Kori Inkpen, Paul Johns, Sarah Tan, Divya Ramesh, Ece Kamar
Abstract
Understanding how racial information impacts human decision making in online systems is critical in today's world. Prior work revealed that race information of criminal defendants, when presented as a text field, had no significant impact on users' judgements of recidivism [13]. We replicated and extended this work to explore how and when race information influences users' judgements, with respect to the saliency of presentation. Our results showed that adding photos to the race labels had a significant impact on recidivism predictions for users who identified as female, but not for those who identified as male. The race of the defendant also impacted these results, with black defendants being less likely to be predicted to recidivate compared to white defendants. These results have strong implications for how systemdesigners choose to display race information, and cautions researchers to be aware of gender and race effects when using Amazon Mechanical Turk workers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 90835532-f379-488a-9f4c-cd7c16b7ff4cCited by top-tier papers7
- Who Is Included in Human Perceptions of AI?: Trust and Perceived Fairness around Healthcare AI and Cultural MistrustMin Kyung Lee, Katherine RichCHI 2021 · 135 citations
- Explanations, Fairness, and Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-MakingJakob Schoeffer, Maria De-Arteaga, Niklas KühlCHI 2024 · 67 citations
- Dealing with Uncertainty: Understanding the Impact of Prognostic Versus Diagnostic Tasks on Trust and Reliance in Human-AI Decision MakingSara Salimzadeh, Gaole He, Ujwal GadirajuCHI 2024 · 40 citations
- The Impact of Algorithmic Risk Assessments on Human Predictions and its Analysis via Crowdsourcing StudiesRiccardo Fogliato, Alexandra Chouldechova, Zachary C. LiptonCSCW 2021 · 25 citations
- The Influences of Task Design on Crowdsourced Judgement: A Case Study of Recidivism Risk EvaluationXiaoni Duan, Chien-Ju Ho, Ming YinWWW 2022 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Race, Gender and Beauty: The Effect of Information Provision on Online Hiring BiasesWeiwen Leung, Zheng Zhang, Daviti Jibuti, Jinhao Zhao et al.CHI 2020 · 24 citations
- Not Just a Preference: Reducing Biased Decision-making on Dating WebsitesZilin Ma, Krzysztof Z. GajosCHI 2022 · 12 citations
- Evaluating 'Prefer not to say' Around Sensitive DisclosuresMark Warner, Agnieszka Kitkowska, Jo Gibbs, Juan F. Maestre et al.CHI 2020 · 21 citations
- An Experimental Study of Bias in Platform Worker Ratings: The Role of Performance Quality and GenderFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Justin Cranshaw, Scott Counts, Walter S. Lasecki et al.CHI 2020 · 15 citations
- Algorithmic Risk Assessments Can Alter Human Decision-Making Processes in High-Stakes Government ContextsBen Green, Yiling ChenCSCW 2021 · 63 citations
