Not Just a Preference: Reducing Biased Decision-making on Dating Websites
Zilin Ma, Krzysztof Z. Gajos
Abstract
As dating websites are becoming an essential part of how people meet intimate and romantic partners, it is vital to design these systems to be resistant to, or at least do not amplify, bias and discrimination. Instead, the results of our online experiment with a simulated dating website, demonstrate that popular dating website design choices, such as the user of the swipe interface (swiping in one direction to indicate a like and in the other direction to express a dislike) and match scores, resulted in people racially biases choices even when they explicitly claimed not to have considered race in their decision-making. This bias was significantly reduced when the order of information presentation was reversed such that people first saw substantive profile information related to their explicitly-stated preferences before seeing the profile name and photo. These results indicate that currently-popular design choices amplify people’s implicit biases in their choices of potential romantic partners, but the effects of the implicit biases can be reduced by carefully redesigning the dating website interfaces.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 92e1f858-5a41-4a0d-9022-d075af8468bbCited by top-tier papers4
- Evaluating the Experience of LGBTQ+ People Using Large Language Model Based Chatbots for Mental Health SupportZilin Ma, Yiyang Mei, Yinru Long, Zhaoyuan Su et al.CHI 2024 · 70 citations
- Social Justice in HCI: A Systematic Literature ReviewIshita Chordia, Leya Breanna Baltaxe-Admony, Ashley Boone, Alyssa Sheehan et al.CHI 2024 · 64 citations
- Dealing with Uncertainty: Understanding the Impact of Prognostic Versus Diagnostic Tasks on Trust and Reliance in Human-AI Decision MakingSara Salimzadeh, Gaole He, Ujwal GadirajuCHI 2024 · 40 citations
- Fair Machine Guidance to Enhance Fair Decision Making in Biased PeopleMingzhe Yang, Hiromi Arai, Naomi Yamashita, Yukino BabaCHI 2024 · 11 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Race, Gender and Beauty: The Effect of Information Provision on Online Hiring BiasesWeiwen Leung, Zheng Zhang, Daviti Jibuti, Jinhao Zhao et al.CHI 2020 · 24 citations
- Supporting Women in Online Dating with a Messaging Interface that Improves their Face-to-Face Meeting DecisionsDouglas Zytko, Victor Regalado, Nicholas Furlo, Sukeshini A. Grandhi et al.CSCW 2020 · 22 citations
- Evaluating 'Prefer not to say' Around Sensitive DisclosuresMark Warner, Agnieszka Kitkowska, Jo Gibbs, Juan F. Maestre et al.CHI 2020 · 21 citations
- XOXO or XX/XY? Gender Essentialism and Queer Exclusion on Dating AppsKaty Weathington, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- Beyond Swipes and Scores: Investigating Practices, Challenges and User-Centered Values in Online Dating AlgorithmsChowon Kang, Yoonseo Choi, Yongjae Sohn, Hyunseung Lim et al.CSCW 2024 · 3 citations
