ACL Findings2025
LoFTI: Localization and Factuality Transfer to Indian Locales
Sona Elza Simon, Soumen Kumar Mondal, Abhishek Singhania, Sayambhu Sen, Preethi Jyothi
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) encode vast amounts of world knowledge acquired via training on large web-scale datasets crawled from the internet. However, the datasets used to train the LLMs typically exhibit a geographical bias towards English-speaking Western countries. This results in LLMs producing biased or hallucinated responses to queries that require answers localized to other geographical regions. In this work, we introduce a new benchmark named LOFTI (Localization and Factuality Transfer to Indian Locales) that can be used to evaluate an LLM's contextual localization and factual text transfer capabilities. LOFTI consists of factual statements about entities in source and target locations; the source locations are spread across the globe and the target locations are all within India with varying degrees of hyperlocality (country, states, cities). The entities span a wide variety of categories. We use LOFTI to evaluate Mixtral, Llama3.3-70B, GPT-4 and two other Mixtral-based approaches well-suited to the task of localized factual transfer. We demonstrate that LOFTI is a high-quality evaluation benchmark and all the models, including GPT-4, produce skewed results across varying levels of hyperlocality.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Builds on7
- FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text GenerationSewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis et al.EMNLP 2023 · 225 citations
- BBQ: A hand-built bias benchmark for question answeringAlicia Parrish, Angelica Chen, Nikita Nangia, Vishakh Padmakumar et al.ACL Findings 2022 · 186 citations
- Large Language Models are Geographically BiasedRohin Manvi, Samar Khanna, Marshall Burke, David B. Lobell et al.ICML 2024 · 107 citations
- Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text GenerationMing Zhong, Yang Liu, Da Yin, Yuning Mao et al.EMNLP 2022 · 103 citations
- CultureLLM: Incorporating Cultural Differences into Large Language ModelsCheng Li, Mengzhuo Chen, Jindong Wang, Sunayana Sitaram et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 101 citations
Related papers
- PARIKSHA: A Large-Scale Investigation of Human-LLM Evaluator Agreement on Multilingual and Multi-Cultural DataIshaan Watts, Varun Gumma, Aditya Yadavalli, Vivek Seshadri et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- IndicGenBench: A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Generation Capabilities of LLMs on Indic LanguagesHarman Singh, Nitish Gupta, Shikhar Bharadwaj, Dinesh Tewari et al.ACL 2024
- CCFQA: A Benchmark for Cross-Lingual and Cross-Modal Speech and Text Factuality EvaluationYexing Du, Kaiyuan Liu, Youcheng Pan, Zheng Chu et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Evaluating the Elementary Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models with MultiQCarolin Holtermann, Paul Röttger, Timm Dill, Anne LauscherACL Findings 2024 · 10 citations
- Factcheck-Bench: Fine-Grained Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Fact-checkersYuxia Wang, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Zain Muhammad Mujahid, Arnav Arora et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 25 citations
