Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generation
Ming Zhong, Yang Liu, Da Yin, Yuning Mao, Yizhu Jiao, Pengfei Liu, Chenguang Zhu, Heng Ji, Jiawei Han
Abstract
Multi-dimensional evaluation is the dominant paradigm for human evaluation in Natural Language Generation (NLG), i.e., evaluating the generated text from multiple explainable dimensions, such as coherence and fluency. However, automatic evaluation in NLG is still dominated by similarity-based metrics, and we lack a reliable framework for a more comprehensive evaluation of advanced models. In this paper, we propose a unified multi-dimensional evaluator UniEval for NLG. We re-frame NLG evaluation as a Boolean Question Answering (QA) task, and by guiding the model with different questions, we can use one evaluator to evaluate from multiple dimensions. Furthermore, thanks to the unified Boolean QA format, we are able to introduce an intermediate learning phase that enables UniEval to incorporate external knowledge from multiple related tasks and gain further improvement. Experiments on three typical NLG tasks show that UniEval correlates substantially better with human judgments than existing metrics. Specifically, compared to the top-performing unified evaluators, UniEval achieves a 23% higher correlation on text summarization, and over 43% on dialogue response generation. Also, UniEval demonstrates a strong zero-shot learning ability for unseen evaluation dimensions and tasks. Source code, data, and all pre-trained evaluators are available at https://github.com/maszhongming/UniEval.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9c9fa361-d3c3-44a2-abb7-dcfc2c80867dCited by top-tier papers79
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Active Retrieval Augmented GenerationZhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, Luyu Gao, Zhiqing Sun et al.EMNLP 2023 · 315 citations
- Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judgeDawei Li, Renliang Sun, Yue Huang, Ming Zhong et al.ICLR 2026 · 150 citations
- LLMScore: Unveiling the Power of Large Language Models in Text-to-Image Synthesis EvaluationYujie Lu, Xianjun Yang, Xiujun Li, Xin Eric Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 119 citations
Builds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
Related papers
- QGEval: Benchmarking Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Question GenerationWeiping Fu, Bifan Wei, Jianxiang Hu, Zhongmin Cai et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
- NLG Evaluation Metrics Beyond Correlation Analysis: An Empirical Metric Preference ChecklistIftitahu Ni'mah, Meng Fang, Vlado Menkovski, Mykola PechenizkiyACL 2023 · 9 citations
- DecompEval: Evaluating Generated Texts as Unsupervised Decomposed Question AnsweringPei Ke, Fei Huang, Fei Mi, Yasheng Wang et al.ACL 2023 · 2 citations
- Compression, Transduction, and Creation: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Natural Language GenerationMingkai Deng, Bowen Tan, Zhengzhong Liu, Eric P. Xing et al.EMNLP 2021 · 49 citations
- Perturbation CheckLists for Evaluating NLG Evaluation MetricsAnanya B. Sai, Tanay Dixit, Dev Yashpal Sheth, Sreyas Mohan et al.EMNLP 2021 · 32 citations
