Local Explanation of Dialogue Response Generation
Yi-Lin Tuan, Connor Pryor, Wenhu Chen, Lise Getoor, William Yang Wang
Abstract
In comparison to the interpretation of classification models, the explanation of sequence generation models is also an important problem, however it has seen little attention. In this work, we study model-agnostic explanations of a representative text generation task -- dialogue response generation. Dialog response generation is challenging with its open-ended sentences and multiple acceptable responses. To gain insights into the reasoning process of a generation model, we propose a new method, local explanation of response generation (LERG) that regards the explanations as the mutual interaction of segments in input and output sentences. LERG views the sequence prediction as uncertainty estimation of a human response and then creates explanations by perturbing the input and calculating the certainty change over the human response. We show that LERG adheres to desired properties of explanations for text generation including unbiased approximation, consistency and cause identification. Empirically, our results show that our method consistently improves other widely used methods on proposed automatic- and human- evaluation metrics for this new task by 4.4-12.8%. Our analysis demonstrates that LERG can extract both explicit and implicit relations between input and output segments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 309b151c-83dc-4dcb-860c-a77f200c1635Cited by top-tier papers2
- Learning towards Selective Data Augmentation for Dialogue GenerationXiuying Chen, Mingzhe Li, Jiayi Zhang, Xiaoqiang Xia et al.AAAI 2023 · 7 citations
- Diagnosing Memorization in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning, One Token at a TimeHuihan Li, You Chen, Siyuan Wang, Yixin He et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on11
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 246 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- How Can I Explain This to You? An Empirical Study of Deep Neural Network Explanation MethodsJeya Vikranth Jeyakumar, Joseph Noor, Yu-Hsi Cheng, Luis Garcia et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 173 citations
- A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text ClassificationPepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma, Isabelle AugensteinEMNLP 2020 · 158 citations
Related papers
- Reflecting on Experiences for Response GenerationChenchen Ye, Lizi Liao, Suyu Liu, Tat-Seng ChuaACM MM 2022 · 12 citations
- CER: Confidence Enhanced Reasoning in LLMsAli Razghandi, Seyed Mohammad Hadi Hosseini, Mahdieh Soleymani BaghshahACL 2025 · 11 citations
- Rationales for Sequential PredictionsKeyon Vafa, Yuntian Deng, David M. Blei, Alexander M. RushEMNLP 2021
- Multi-Level Explanations for Generative Language ModelsLucas Monteiro Paes, Dennis Wei, Hyo Jin Do, Hendrik Strobelt et al.ACL 2025 · 16 citations
- Counterfactual Metarules for Local and Global RecourseTom Bewley, Salim I. Amoukou, Saumitra Mishra, Daniele Magazzeni et al.ICML 2024 · 4 citations
