Rationales for Sequential Predictions
Keyon Vafa, Yuntian Deng, David M. Blei, Alexander M. Rush
Abstract
Sequence models are a critical component of modern NLP systems, but their predictions are difficult to explain. We consider model explanations though rationales, subsets of context that can explain individual model predictions. We find sequential rationales by solving a combinatorial optimization: the best rationale is the smallest subset of input tokens that would predict the same output as the full sequence. Enumerating all subsets is intractable, so we propose an efficient greedy algorithm to approximate this objective. The algorithm, which is called greedy rationalization, applies to any model. For this approach to be effective, the model should form compatible conditional distributions when making predictions on incomplete subsets of the context. This condition can be enforced with a short finetuning step. We study greedy rationalization on language modeling and machine translation. Compared to existing baselines, greedy rationalization is best at optimizing the combinatorial objective and provides the most faithful rationales. On a new dataset of annotated sequential rationales, greedy rationales are most similar to human rationales.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 72131b11-8bb5-41ef-8d0f-86da9705ca33Cited by top-tier papers12
- The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance ExplanationsPeter Hase, Harry Xie, Mohit BansalNeurIPS 2021 · 121 citations
- Learning to Scaffold: Optimizing Model Explanations for TeachingPatrick Fernandes, Marcos V. Treviso, Danish Pruthi, André F. T. Martins et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 26 citations
- Towards Trustworthy Explanation: On Causal RationalizationWenbo Zhang, Tong Wu, Yunlong Wang, Yong Cai et al.ICML 2023 · 25 citations
- Why and How LLMs Hallucinate: Connecting the Dots with Subsequence AssociationsYiyou Sun, Yu Gai, Lijie Chen, Abhilasha Ravichander et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Quantifying the Plausibility of Context Reliance in Neural Machine TranslationGabriele Sarti, Grzegorz Chrupala, Malvina Nissim, Arianna BisazzaICLR 2024 · 8 citations
Builds on7
- On Identifiability in TransformersGino Brunner, Yang Liu, Damian Pascual, Oliver Richter et al.ICLR 2020 · 210 citations
- Attention is Not Only a Weight: Analyzing Transformers with Vector NormsGoro Kobayashi, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Sho Yokoi, Kentaro InuiEMNLP 2020 · 138 citations
- ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP ModelsJay DeYoung, Sarthak Jain, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Eric P. Lehman et al.ACL 2020 · 36 citations
- Rissanen Data Analysis: Examining Dataset Characteristics via Description LengthEthan Perez, Douwe Kiela, Kyunghyun ChoICML 2021 · 25 citations
- Towards Transparent and Explainable Attention ModelsAkash Kumar Mohankumar, Preksha Nema, Sharan Narasimhan, Mitesh M. Khapra et al.ACL 2020 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Learning Robust Rationales for Model Explainability: A Guidance-Based ApproachShuaibo Hu, Kui YuAAAI 2024 · 11 citations
- Knowledge-Grounded Self-Rationalization via Extractive and Natural Language ExplanationsBodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Oana Camburu, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Julian J. McAuleyICML 2022 · 40 citations
- Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text RationalesSarah Wiegreffe, Ana Marasovic, Noah A. SmithEMNLP 2021 · 12 citations
- QUASER: Question Answering with Scalable Extractive RationalizationAsish Ghoshal, Srinivasan Iyer, Bhargavi Paranjape, Kushal Lakhotia et al.SIGIR 2022 · 2 citations
- Boosting Explainability through Selective Rationalization in Pre-trained Language ModelsLibing Yuan, Shuaibo Hu, Kui Yu, Le WuKDD 2025 · 1 citation
