Data to Defense: The Role of Curation in Aligning Large Language Models Against Safety Compromise
Xiaoqun Liu, Jiacheng Liang, Luoxi Tang, Muchao Ye, Weicheng Ma, Zhaohan Xi
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are widely adapted for downstream applications through fine-tuning, a process named customization. However, recent studies have identified a vulnerability during this process, where malicious samples can compromise the robustness of LLMs and amplify harmful behaviors. To address this challenge, we propose an adaptive data curation approach allowing any text to be curated to enhance its effectiveness in counteracting harmful samples during customization. To avoid the need for additional defensive modules, we further introduce a comprehensive mitigation framework spanning the lifecycle of the customization process: before customization to immunize LLMs against future compromise attempts, during customization to neutralize risks, and after customization to restore compromised models. Experimental results demonstrate a significant reduction in compromising effects, achieving up to a 100% success rate in generating safe responses. By combining adaptive data curation with lifecycle-based mitigation strategies, this work represents a solid step forward in mitigating compromising risks and ensuring the secure adaptation of LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2dcd39a7-05e3-4a02-ac46-a4a47e72849eBuilds on20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- Aligning AI With Shared Human ValuesDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andrew Critch et al.ICLR 2021 · 878 citations
Related papers
- Token-level Data Selection for Safe LLM Fine-tuningYanping Li, Zhening Liu, Zijian Li, Zehong Lin et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Antibody: Strengthening Defense Against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Gradient InfluenceQuoc Minh Nguyen, Trung Le, Jing Wu, Anh Tuan Bui et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Few Tokens, Big Leverage: Preserving Safety Alignment by Constraining Safety Tokens during Fine-tuningGuoli Wang, Haonan Shi, Tu Ouyang, An WangKDD 2026 · 5 citations
- Why LLM Safety Guardrails Collapse After Fine-tuning: A Similarity Analysis Between Alignment and Fine-tuning DatasetsLei Hsiung, Tianyu Pang, Yung-Chen Tang, Linyue Song et al.ACL 2026 · 22 citations
- Safety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost: A Baseline for Vision Large Language ModelsYongshuo Zong, Ondrej Bohdal, Tingyang Yu, Yongxin Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 140 citations
