Few Tokens, Big Leverage: Preserving Safety Alignment by Constraining Safety Tokens during Fine-tuning
Guoli Wang, Haonan Shi, Tu Ouyang, An Wang
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often require fine-tuning (FT) to perform well on downstream tasks, but FT can induce safety-alignment drift even when the training dataset contains only benign data. Prior work shows that introducing a small fraction of harmful data can substantially compromise LLM refusal behavior, causing LLMs to comply with harmful requests. Existing defense methods often rely on model-wide interventions, such as restricting which parameters are updated or injecting additional safety data, which can limit generality and degrade downstream task performance. To address these limitations, we propose a fine-tuning framework called Preserving Safety Alignment via Constrained Tokens (PACT), which stabilizes the model's confidence on safety tokens. Our approach is motivated by the empirical observation that safety-aligned behavior is reflected in the model's token-level output confidence and is often concentrated on a small subset of safety-related tokens. During downstream fine-tuning, we regularize the fine-tuned model to match the aligned reference model's confidence on safety-related tokens at each response step, while leaving non-safety tokens largely unconstrained to allow effective task adaptation. This targeted constraint prevents alignment drift without imposing global restrictions that typically trade off with model utility. Our code is available at https://github.com/Glresearch1/PACT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on19
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
Related papers
- AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety BasinShuo Yang, Qihui Zhang, Yuyang Liu, Yue Huang et al.AAAI 2026 · 19 citations
- A Guardrail for Safety Preservation: When Safety-Sensitive Subspace Meets Harmful-Resistant Null-SpaceBingjie Zhang, Yibo Yang, Renzhe, Dandan Guo et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Token-level Data Selection for Safe LLM Fine-tuningYanping Li, Zhening Liu, Zijian Li, Zehong Lin et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Safety Anchor: Defending Harmful Fine-tuning via Geometric BottlenecksGuoxin Lu, Letian Sha, Qing Wang, Peijie Sun et al.ICML 2026
- Safe Delta: Consistently Preserving Safety when Fine-Tuning LLMs on Diverse DatasetsNing Lu, Shengcai Liu, Jiahao Wu, Weiyu Chen et al.ICML 2025
