Token-level Data Selection for Safe LLM Fine-tuning
Yanping Li, Zhening Liu, Zijian Li, Zehong Lin, Jun Zhang
Abstract
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on custom datasets has become a standard approach for adapting these models to specific domains and applications. However, recent studies have shown that such fine-tuning can lead to significant degradation in the model's safety. Existing defense methods operate at the sample level and often suffer from an unsatisfactory trade-off between safety and utility. To address this limitation, we perform a systematic token-level diagnosis of safety degradation during fine-tuning. Based on this, we propose token-level data selection for safe LLM fine-tuning (TOSS), a novel framework that quantifies the safety risk of each token by measuring the loss difference between a safety-degraded model and a utility-oriented model. This token-level granularity enables accurate identification and removal of unsafe tokens, thereby preserving valuable task-specific information. In addition, we introduce a progressive refinement strategy, TOSS-Pro, which iteratively enhances the safety-degraded model's ability to identify unsafe tokens. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach robustly safeguards LLMs during fine-tuning while achieving superior downstream task performance, significantly outperforming existing sample-level defense methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/Polly-LYP/TOSS .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ec2ffaff-3e9c-45f0-bad6-68f08ea90b97Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,166 citations
- Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting GenerationYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Mengzhou Xia, Kai Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 481 citations
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora et al.ICML 2024 · 460 citations
Related papers
- Few Tokens, Big Leverage: Preserving Safety Alignment by Constraining Safety Tokens during Fine-tuningGuoli Wang, Haonan Shi, Tu Ouyang, An WangKDD 2026 · 5 citations
- Safe Delta: Consistently Preserving Safety when Fine-Tuning LLMs on Diverse DatasetsNing Lu, Shengcai Liu, Jiahao Wu, Weiyu Chen et al.ICML 2025
- SEAL: Safety-enhanced Aligned LLM Fine-tuning via Bilevel Data SelectionHan Shen, Pin-Yu Chen, Payel Das, Tianyi ChenICLR 2025
- Data to Defense: The Role of Curation in Aligning Large Language Models Against Safety CompromiseXiaoqun Liu, Jiacheng Liang, Luoxi Tang, Muchao Ye et al.EMNLP 2025
- TLPO: Token-Level Policy Optimization for Mitigating Language Confusion in Large Language ModelsJinho Choo, JunSeung Lee, Jimyeong Kim, Yeeho Song et al.ACL 2026
