Context-aware Graph Neural Network for Graph-based Fraud Detection with Extremely Limited Labels
Pengbo Li, Hang Yu, Xiangfeng Luo
Abstract
Graph-based fraud detection is crucial in identifying illegal activities in social networks, finance, and other sectors. Despite recent progress in this area, most of current researches typically require a large amount of annotated data to demonstrate its benefits. In practice, obtaining sufficient high-quality annotated data is challenging, limiting the effectiveness of model training. Therefore, leveraging extremely limited label information is crucial to enhance model performance. We propose a context-aware graph neural network (CGNN) to address this. CGNN performs category semantic decomposition on the contextual neighbor features of the center node to enrich the category semantics. In the neighbor message aggregation stage, the denoising attention mechanism enables the center node to adaptively aggregate heterophilic and homophilic information from neighbors. Particularly for unlabeled data, feature augmentation within the category subspace and consistency regularization driven by entropy minimization ensure that such data can further enhance model performance under explicit semantic guidance. We demonstrate on four real-world datasets that CGNN significantly outperforms other baseline methods with extremely limited labels.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2c3e9523-858f-41bb-940d-a4c892a1248dCited by top-tier papers2
- CAT: Can Trust be Predicted with Context-Awareness in Dynamic Heterogeneous Networks?Jie Wang, Zheng Yan, Jiahe Lan, Xuyan Li et al.NDSS 2026 · 2 citations
- Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive LearningRui Ou, Kun Zhu, Nana Zhang, Jiangtong Li et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on12
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and ConfidenceKihyuk Sohn, David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Zizhao Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,129 citations
- ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Matching and Augmentation AnchoringDavid Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Ekin D. Cubuk, Alex Kurakin et al.ICLR 2020 · 469 citations
- Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly DetectionJianheng Tang, Jiajin Li, Ziqi Gao, Jia LiICML 2022 · 365 citations
- CoMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Contrastive Graph RegularizationJunnan Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICCV 2021 · 333 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Graph-Based Fraud Detection in Sight of Heterophily and SpectrumFan Xu, Nan Wang, Hao Wu, Xuezhi Wen et al.AAAI 2024 · 72 citations
- H2-FDetector: A GNN-based Fraud Detector with Homophilic and Heterophilic ConnectionsFengzhao Shi, Yanan Cao, Yanmin Shang, Yuchen Zhou et al.WWW 2022 · 149 citations
- DGA-GNN: Dynamic Grouping Aggregation GNN for Fraud DetectionMingjiang Duan, Tongya Zheng, Yang Gao, Gang Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 42 citations
- Integrated Mixture of Neighborhood and Community Experts for Graph-Based Fraud DetectionZhizhi Yu, Di Jin, Dongxiao He, Wenhuan Lu et al.WWW 2026
- Dynamic Neighborhood Modeling via Node-Subgraph Contrastive Learning for Graph-Based Fraud DetectionZhizhi Yu, Chundong Liang, Xinglong Chang, Dongxiao He et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
