H2-FDetector: A GNN-based Fraud Detector with Homophilic and Heterophilic Connections
Fengzhao Shi, Yanan Cao, Yanmin Shang, Yuchen Zhou, Chuan Zhou, Jia Wu
Abstract
In the fraud graph, fraudsters often interact with a large number of benign entities to hide themselves. So, there are not only the homophilic connections formed by the same label nodes (similar nodes), but also the heterophilic connections formed by the different label nodes (dissimilar nodes). However, the existing GNN-based fraud detection methods just enhance the homophily in fraud graph and use the low-pass filter to retain the commonality of node features among the neighbors, which inevitably ignore the difference among neighbor of heterophilic connections. To address this problem, we propose a Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detector with Homophilic and Heterophilic Interactions (H2-FDetector for short). Firstly, we identify the homophilic and heterophilic connections with the supervision of labeled nodes. Next, we design a new information aggregation strategy to make the homophilic connections propagate similar information and the heterophilic connections propagate difference information. Finally, a prototype prior is introduced to guide the identification of fraudsters. Extensive experiments on two real public benchmark fraud detection tasks demonstrate that our method apparently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 546287cf-53e9-4a3b-9ec4-bdac915cf64eCited by top-tier papers29
- Addressing Heterophily in Graph Anomaly Detection: A Perspective of Graph SpectrumYuan Gao, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Zhenguang Liu et al.WWW 2023 · 189 citations
- Truncated Affinity Maximization: One-class Homophily Modeling for Graph Anomaly DetectionHezhe Qiao, Guansong PangNeurIPS 2023 · 84 citations
- Revisiting Graph-Based Fraud Detection in Sight of Heterophily and SpectrumFan Xu, Nan Wang, Hao Wu, Xuezhi Wen et al.AAAI 2024 · 72 citations
- Label Information Enhanced Fraud Detection against Low Homophily in GraphsYuchen Wang, Jinghui Zhang, Zhengjie Huang, Weibin Li et al.WWW 2023 · 69 citations
- Consistency Training with Learnable Data Augmentation for Graph Anomaly Detection with Limited SupervisionNan Chen, Zemin Liu, Bryan Hooi, Bingsheng He et al.ICLR 2024 · 56 citations
Builds on8
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
- Beyond Low-frequency Information in Graph Convolutional NetworksDeyu Bo, Xiao Wang, Chuan Shi, Huawei ShenAAAI 2021 · 773 citations
- Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud DetectionYang Liu, Xiang Ao, Zidi Qin, Jianfeng Chi et al.WWW 2021 · 527 citations
- Graph Neural Networks with HeterophilyJiong Zhu, Ryan A. Rossi, Anup Rao, Tung Mai et al.AAAI 2021 · 393 citations
- Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural NetworkEli Chien, Jianhao Peng, Pan Li, Olgica MilenkovicICLR 2021 · 93 citations
Related papers
- Partitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud DetectionWei Zhuo, Zemin Liu, Bryan Hooi, Bingsheng He et al.ICLR 2024 · 50 citations
- Integrated Mixture of Neighborhood and Community Experts for Graph-Based Fraud DetectionZhizhi Yu, Di Jin, Dongxiao He, Wenhuan Lu et al.WWW 2026
- Dynamic Neighborhood Modeling via Node-Subgraph Contrastive Learning for Graph-Based Fraud DetectionZhizhi Yu, Chundong Liang, Xinglong Chang, Dongxiao He et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- DGA-GNN: Dynamic Grouping Aggregation GNN for Fraud DetectionMingjiang Duan, Tongya Zheng, Yang Gao, Gang Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 42 citations
- A Label-free Heterophily-guided Approach for Unsupervised Graph Fraud DetectionJunjun Pan, Yixin Liu, Xin Zheng, Yizhen Zheng et al.AAAI 2025 · 29 citations
