Dynamic Neighborhood Modeling via Node-Subgraph Contrastive Learning for Graph-Based Fraud Detection
Zhizhi Yu, Chundong Liang, Xinglong Chang, Dongxiao He, Di Jin, Jianguo Wei
Abstract
Fraud detection that aims to discern frauds from the majority of benigns has become an increasingly prominent research field. Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely applied in graph-based fraud detection due to their outstanding data analysis and mining capabilities. However, owing to the inherent homophily-heterophily mixture and class imbalance of fraud graphs, most GNNs with homophily assumption inevitably suffer from local abnormal signal loss during information propagation, posing significant challenges in situations where frauds are rare and valuable. To address the aforementioned issues, we present a novel dynamic neighborhood modeling via node-subgraph contrastive learning for graph-based fraud detection, dubbed DCL-GFD. Specifically, we first design a node abnormality estimation module from the perspective of feature, which analyses the likelihood of a node belonging to fraud or benign by comparing the feature similarity between the target node and its corresponding subgraph. We then present a dynamic neighborhood modeling mechanism guided by the abnormal probability of a node to adaptively group and aggregate neighborhood information. By this means, the target node can effectively aggregate the neighbor information from the perspective of fraud or benign, thereby preserving as much fraud characteristics that occupy minority population as possible. Extensive experiments across four real-world fraud detection datasets demonstrate the superiority and effectiveness of our proposed DCL-GFD over state-of-the-art baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Correcting False Alarms from Unseen: Adapting Graph Anomaly Detectors at Test TimeJunjun Pan, Yixin Liu, Chuan Zhou, Fei Xiong et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive LearningRui Ou, Kun Zhu, Nana Zhang, Jiangtong Li et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on21
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
- GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-TrainingJiezhong Qiu, Qibin Chen, Yuxiao Dong, Jing Zhang et al.KDD 2020 · 755 citations
- Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud DetectionYang Liu, Xiang Ao, Zidi Qin, Jianfeng Chi et al.WWW 2021 · 527 citations
- AM-GCN: Adaptive Multi-channel Graph Convolutional NetworksXiao Wang, Meiqi Zhu, Deyu Bo, Peng Cui et al.KDD 2020 · 464 citations
Related papers
- Integrated Mixture of Neighborhood and Community Experts for Graph-Based Fraud DetectionZhizhi Yu, Di Jin, Dongxiao He, Wenhuan Lu et al.WWW 2026
- Revisiting Graph-Based Fraud Detection in Sight of Heterophily and SpectrumFan Xu, Nan Wang, Hao Wu, Xuezhi Wen et al.AAAI 2024 · 72 citations
- DiG-In-GNN: Discriminative Feature Guided GNN-Based Fraud Detector against Inconsistencies in Multi-Relation Fraud GraphJinghui Zhang, Zhengjia Xu, Dingyang Lv, Zhan Shi et al.AAAI 2024 · 26 citations
- H2-FDetector: A GNN-based Fraud Detector with Homophilic and Heterophilic ConnectionsFengzhao Shi, Yanan Cao, Yanmin Shang, Yuchen Zhou et al.WWW 2022 · 149 citations
- DGA-GNN: Dynamic Grouping Aggregation GNN for Fraud DetectionMingjiang Duan, Tongya Zheng, Yang Gao, Gang Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 42 citations
