Mind the Trust Gap: Identifying (Mis)alignments in Teacher-Student Views Toward Control and Agency in K-12 Classroom AI
Tomohiro Nagashima, Lisa Kristin Siegrist, Niklas Scholz, Shintaro Sato, Martina Vincoli, Man Su
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based technologies have been integrated into school classrooms where multiple stakeholders (with different roles) interact with each other, it is critical to deeply understand stakeholder views in the classroom. In particular, prior work has not fully uncovered how teachers' and school students' views might or might not align well with each other, especially in K-12 classrooms. We conducted a speed-dating study using storyboards with 16 school students and 15 school teachers in Germany to investigate alignments and misalignments between their views on student-AI decision-making control in K-12 classroom. Through an explicit pair-matching analysis, we found that students and teachers had misaligned views on several key topics, including how much they trust AI and social and emotional aspects of student learning with AI. Findings also revealed the importance of teacher-student relationships outside of AI use that shape stakeholders' views and interactions. We discuss potential reasons for the observed misaligned views and strategies to fill the perspective gaps. This study illustrates the complexities of preferences in teacher-student-AI interactions that depend on the dynamic relations among the stakeholders.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 24aed59d-be4a-4fe2-95be-e116383015fcBuilds on12
- He Is Just Like Me: A Study of the Long-Term Use of Smart Speakers by Parents and ChildrenRadhika Garg, Subhasree SenguptaUbiComp 2020 · 139 citations
- Teachers, Parents, and Students' perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy EducationAriel Han, Xiaofei Zhou, Zhenyao Cai, Shenshen Han et al.CHI 2024 · 104 citations
- Deliberating with AI: Improving Decision-Making for the Future through Participatory AI Design and Stakeholder DeliberationAngie Zhang, Olympia Walker, Kaci Nguyen, Jiajun Dai et al.CSCW 2023 · 71 citations
- The Last Decade of HCI Research on Children and Voice-based Conversational AgentsRadhika Garg, Hua Cui, Spencer Seligson, Bo Zhang et al.CHI 2022 · 71 citations
- Guiding Students in Using LLMs in Supported Learning Environments: Effects on Interaction Dynamics, Learner Performance, Confidence, and TrustHarsh Kumar, Ilya Musabirov, Mohi Reza, Jiakai Shi et al.CSCW 2024 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Balancing Teacher and Student Agency: Co-Orchestration Tool Design Supporting Real-Time Dynamic PairingKexin Bella Yang, Menghan Liu, Liyi Xu, Nikol Rummel et al.CSCW 2026
- Who is Helping Whom? Student Concerns about AI-Teacher Collaboration in Higher Education ClassroomsBingyi Han, Simon Coghlan, George Buchanan, Dana McKayCSCW 2025 · 25 citations
- Trust in AI-assisted Decision Making: Perspectives from Those Behind the System and Those for Whom the Decision is MadeOleksandra Vereschak, Fatemeh Alizadeh, Gilles Bailly, Baptiste CaramiauxCHI 2024 · 31 citations
- Unremarkable to Remarkable AI Agent: Exploring Boundaries of Agent Intervention for Adults With and Without Cognitive ImpairmentMai Lee Chang, Samantha Reig, Alicia (Hyun Jin) Lee, Anna Huang et al.CSCW 2025 · 9 citations
- Sometimes You Need Facts, and Sometimes a Hug: Understanding Older Adults' Preferences for Explanations in LLM-Based Conversational AI SystemsNiharika Mathur, Tamara Zubatiy, Agata Rozga, Jodi Forlizzi et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
