Sometimes You Need Facts, and Sometimes a Hug: Understanding Older Adults' Preferences for Explanations in LLM-Based Conversational AI Systems
Niharika Mathur, Tamara Zubatiy, Agata Rozga, Jodi Forlizzi, Elizabeth D. Mynatt
Abstract
Designing Conversational AI systems to support older adults requires these systems to explain their behavior in ways that align with older adults’ preferences and context. While prior work has emphasized the importance of AI explainability in building user trust, relatively little is known about older adults’ requirements and perceptions of AI-generated explanations. To address this gap, we conducted an exploratory Speed Dating study with 23 older adults to understand their responses to contextually grounded AI explanations. Our findings reveal the highly context-dependent nature of explanations, shaped by conversational cues such as the content, tone, and framing of explanation. We also found that explanations are often interpreted as interactive, multi-turn conversational exchanges with the AI, and can be helpful in calibrating urgency, guiding actionability, and providing insights into older adults’ daily lives for their family members. We conclude by discussing implications for designing context-sensitive and personalized explanations in Conversational AI systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f0197e07-b348-442a-9271-adda0fa97458Cited by top-tier papers2
- "The Only Thing Certain About This is Uncertainty": Exploring Informal Care Coordination Practices Among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive ImpairmentJosey M. Benandi, Niharika Mathur, Sangha Park, Tracy L. Mitzner et al.CSCW 2026
- Privacy Cards for Surfacing Mental Models and Exploring Privacy Concerns: A Case Study of Voice-First Ambient Interfaces with Older AdultsAndrea Cuadra, Samar Sabie, Yan Shvartzshnaider, Deborah EstrinCHI 2026
Builds on25
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Manipulating and Measuring Model InterpretabilityForough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CHI 2021 · 663 citations
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemsUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael J. Muller, Mark O. Riedl et al.CHI 2021 · 505 citations
- Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and NeedsSungsoo Ray Hong, Jessica Hullman, Enrico BertiniCSCW 2020 · 219 citations
- The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI ExplanationsUpol Ehsan, Samir Passi, Q. Vera Liao, Larry Chan et al.CHI 2024 · 121 citations
Related papers
- Unremarkable to Remarkable AI Agent: Exploring Boundaries of Agent Intervention for Adults With and Without Cognitive ImpairmentMai Lee Chang, Samantha Reig, Alicia (Hyun Jin) Lee, Anna Huang et al.CSCW 2025 · 9 citations
- The Effect of Explanation Design on User Perception of Smart Home Lighting Systems: A Mixed-method InvestigationJiaxin Dai, Chao Zhang, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, Samantha Peeters et al.CHI 2023 · 12 citations
- Do Expressions Change Decisions? Exploring the Impact of AI's Explanation Tone on Decision-MakingAyano Okoso, Mingzhe Yang, Yukino BabaCHI 2025 · 18 citations
- Preferences for AI Explanations Based on Cognitive Style and Socio-Cultural FactorsHana Kopecka, Jose Such, Michael LuckCSCW 2024 · 15 citations
- Clarifying or Complicating?: Understanding Older Adults' Engagement with Real-World XAI in E-CommerceSeo Hyeong Kim, Esther Hehsun Kim, Huiyeon Yang, Joonhwan Lee et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
