Balancing Teacher and Student Agency: Co-Orchestration Tool Design Supporting Real-Time Dynamic Pairing
Kexin Bella Yang, Menghan Liu, Liyi Xu, Nikol Rummel, Vincent Aleven
Abstract
In human-AI interaction, respecting user agency is essential for fostering trust and sustaining effective use of technology. In educational settings, dynamically integrating individual and collaborative learning offers pedagogical value by supporting personalized, self-paced learning experiences. Prior research has demonstrated the feasibility of this approach through intelligent tutoring systems and human-AI co-orchestration tools. However, how to balance teacher and student control in this process remains largely unexplored. This work explores the design space of how control can be distributed between teachers and students across the orchestration process, using participatory speed dating and a mixed-method analysis. We focus on three stages of the pairing process: before, during, and after, taking context in designing classroom orchestration tools that support teachers in dynamically coordinating student transitions between individual practice and collaborative problem-solving. It contributes empirical insights to the fields of educational technology and HCI by framing these findings within a theoretical design space, emphasizing the balance of multi-stakeholder agency and control. We propose design recommendations for achieving hybrid-control in analytic-based orchestration tools in pairing contexts. We recommend ensuring structured teacher guidance in the beginning, while progressively increasing student autonomy over time as activities unfold.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on5
- How does HCI Understand Human Agency and Autonomy?Dan Bennett, Oussama Metatla, Anne Roudaut, Elisa D. MeklerCHI 2023 · 107 citations
- Stakeholder-Centered AI Design: Co-Designing Worker Tools with Gig Workers through Data ProbesAngie Zhang, Alexander Boltz, Jonathan Lynn, Chun Wei Wang et al.CHI 2023 · 48 citations
- Pair-Up: Prototyping Human-AI Co-orchestration of Dynamic Transitions between Individual and Collaborative Learning in the ClassroomKexin Bella Yang, Vanessa Echeverría, Zijing Lu, Hongyu Mao et al.CHI 2023 · 43 citations
- Who is Helping Whom? Student Concerns about AI-Teacher Collaboration in Higher Education ClassroomsBingyi Han, Simon Coghlan, George Buchanan, Dana McKayCSCW 2025 · 25 citations
- BIDTrainer: An LLMs-driven Education Tool for Enhancing the Understanding and Reasoning in Bio-inspired DesignLiuqing Chen, Zhaojun Jiang, Duowei Xia, Zebin Cai et al.CHI 2024 · 23 citations
Related papers
- Mind the Trust Gap: Identifying (Mis)alignments in Teacher-Student Views Toward Control and Agency in K-12 Classroom AITomohiro Nagashima, Lisa Kristin Siegrist, Niklas Scholz, Shintaro Sato et al.CSCW 2026
- Exploring Collaboration Patterns and Strategies in Human-AI Co-creation through the Lens of Agency: A Scoping Review of the Top-tier HCI LiteratureShuning Zhang, Hui Wang, Xin YiCSCW 2025 · 31 citations
- "Control Is a Trajectory, Not a Point": Conceptualizing Control in Human-AI Co-CreativityAlayt Issak, Jeba Rezwana, Casper HarteveldCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- ClassAid: A Real-time Instructor-AI-Student Orchestration System for Classroom Programming ActivitiesGefei Zhang, Guodao Sun, Meng Xia, Ronghua LiangCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- 'Show It, Don't Just Say It': The Complementary Effects of Instruction Multimodality for Software GuidanceEmran Poh, Yueyue Hou, Tianyi Zhang, Jiannan LiCHI 2026 · 1 citation
