Opportunities and Barriers for AI Feedback on Meeting Inclusion in Socioorganizational Teams
Mo Houtti, Moyan Zhou, Daniel Runningen, Surabhi Sunil, Leor Porat, Harmanpreet Kaur, Loren Terveen, Stevie Chancellor
Abstract
Inclusion is important for meeting effectiveness, which is in turn central to organizational functioning. One way of improving inclusion in meetings is through feedback, but social dynamics make giving feedback difficult. We propose that AI agents can facilitate feedback exchange by being psychologically safer recipients, and we test this through a meeting system with an AI agent feedback mediator. When delivering feedback, the agent uses the Induced Hypocrisy Procedure, a social psychological technique that prompts behavior change by highlighting value-behavior inconsistencies. In a within-subjects lab study (n = 28), the agent made speaking times more balanced and improved meeting quality. However, a field study at a small consulting firm (n = 10) revealed organizational barriers that led to its use for personal reflection rather than feedback exchange. We contribute a novel sociotechnical system for feedback exchange in groups, and empirical findings demonstrating the importance of considering organizational barriers in designing AI tools for organizations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1fc65ae1-809c-4892-a1d6-c443c3607fc0Builds on25
- The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AILev Tankelevitch, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, Ava Elizabeth Scott et al.CHI 2024 · 279 citations
- "It's a Fair Game", or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational AgentsZhiping Zhang, Michelle Jia, Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Bingsheng Yao et al.CHI 2024 · 92 citations
- Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAIUpol Ehsan, Koustuv Saha, Munmun De Choudhury, Mark O. RiedlCSCW 2023 · 84 citations
- Optimizing for Happiness and Productivity: Modeling Opportune Moments for Transitions and Breaks at WorkHarmanpreet Kaur, Alex C. Williams, Daniel McDuff, Mary Czerwinski et al.CHI 2020 · 83 citations
- AffectiveSpotlight: Facilitating the Communication of Affective Responses from Audience Members during Online PresentationsPrasanth Murali, Javier Hernandez, Daniel McDuff, Kael Rowan et al.CHI 2021 · 81 citations
Related papers
- Observe, Ask, Intervene: Designing AI Agents for More Inclusive MeetingsMo Houtti, Moyan Zhou, Loren Terveen, Stevie ChancellorCHI 2025 · 19 citations
- Are We On Track? AI-Assisted Active and Passive Goal Reflection During MeetingsXinyue Chen, Lev Tankelevitch, Rishi Vanukuru, Ava Elizabeth Scott et al.CHI 2025 · 23 citations
- MeetingCoach: An Intelligent Dashboard for Supporting Effective & Inclusive MeetingsSamiha Samrose, Daniel McDuff, Robert Sim, Jina Suh et al.CHI 2021 · 69 citations
- Feedback by Design: Understanding and Overcoming User Feedback Barriers in Conversational AgentsNikhil Sharma, Zheng Zhang, Daniel Lee, Namita Krishnan et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Investigating LLM-Powered Dissenting Minority Support in Power-Imbalanced Group Decision-Making: Counterargument and Mediation as Intervention StrategiesSoohwan Lee, Seoyeong Hwang, Mingyu Kim, Dajung Kim et al.CSCW 2026
