Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAI
Upol Ehsan, Koustuv Saha, Munmun De Choudhury, Mark O. Riedl
Abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) systems are sociotechnical in nature; thus, they are subject to the sociotechnical gap-divide between the technical affordances and the social needs. However, charting this gap is challenging. In the context of XAI, we argue that charting the gap improves our problem understanding, which can reflexively provide actionable insights to improve explainability. Utilizing two case studies in distinct domains, we empirically derive a framework that facilitates systematic charting of the sociotechnical gap by connecting AI guidelines in the context of XAI and elucidating how to use them to address the gap. We apply the framework to a third case in a new domain, showcasing its affordances. Finally, we discuss conceptual implications of the framework, share practical considerations in its operationalization, and offer guidance on transferring it to new contexts. By making conceptual and practical contributions to understanding the sociotechnical gap in XAI, the framework expands the XAI design space.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 63bb3bb3-037c-49c8-bcff-ee5f109ded87Cited by top-tier papers16
- Explanations, Fairness, and Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-MakingJakob Schoeffer, Maria De-Arteaga, Niklas KühlCHI 2024 · 67 citations
- Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AIUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Samir Passi, Mark O. Riedl et al.CSCW 2024 · 41 citations
- A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness EvaluationsGlen Berman, Nitesh Goyal, Michael MadaioCHI 2024 · 40 citations
- Large Language Models in Qualitative Research: Uses, Tensions, and IntentionsHope Schroeder, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Casey Randazzo, David Mimno et al.CHI 2025 · 40 citations
- Perceptions of Sentient AI and Other Digital Minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) SurveyJacy Reese Anthis, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Ali Ladak, Aikaterina ManoliCHI 2025 · 24 citations
Builds on16
- What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design ConsiderationsDuri Long, Brian MagerkoCHI 2020 · 2,947 citations
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Manipulating and Measuring Model InterpretabilityForough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CHI 2021 · 663 citations
- Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to DesignQian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn P. Rosé, John ZimmermanCHI 2020 · 604 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
Related papers
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemsUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael J. Muller, Mark O. Riedl et al.CHI 2021 · 505 citations
- XAIR: A Framework of Explainable AI in Augmented RealityXuhai Xu, Anna Yu, Tanya R. Jonker, Kashyap Todi et al.CHI 2023 · 73 citations
- (Mis)Communicating with our AI SystemsLaura Cros Vila, Bob L. T. SturmCHI 2025 · 2 citations
- Predicting and Explaining Mobile UI Tappability with Vision Modeling and Saliency AnalysisEldon Schoop, Xin Zhou, Gang Li, Zhourong Chen et al.CHI 2022 · 29 citations
- Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their NeedsHarini Suresh, Steven R. Gomez, Kevin K. Nam, Arvind SatyanarayanCHI 2021 · 115 citations
