Feedback by Design: Understanding and Overcoming User Feedback Barriers in Conversational Agents
Nikhil Sharma, Zheng Zhang, Daniel Lee, Namita Krishnan, Guang-Jie Ren, Ziang Xiao, Yunyao Li
Abstract
High-quality feedback is essential for effective human–AI interaction. It bridges knowledge gaps, corrects digressions, and shapes system behavior; both during interaction and throughout model development. Yet despite its importance, human feedback to AI is often infrequent and low quality. This gap motivates a critical examination of human feedback during interactions with AIs. To understand and overcome the challenges preventing users from giving high-quality feedback, we conducted two studies examining feedback dynamics between humans and conversational agents (CAs). Our formative study, through the lens of Grice’s maxims, identified four Feedback Barriers—Common Ground, Verifiability, Communication, and Informativeness—that prevent high-quality feedback by users. Building on these findings, we derive three design desiderata and show that systems incorporating scaffolds aligned with these desiderata enabled users to provide higher-quality feedback. Finally, we detail a call for action to the broader AI community for advances in Large Language Models capabilities to overcome Feedback Barriers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1ed34bf0-3f08-43f0-a48d-e65cb5f312e0Builds on31
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 1,792 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
Related papers
- Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Challenges in Prompt Based Interactions with LLMsHariharan Subramonyam, Roy Pea, Christopher Lawrence Pondoc, Maneesh Agrawala et al.CHI 2024 · 137 citations
- ULTRAFEEDBACK: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI FeedbackGanqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Ning Ding, Guanming Yao et al.ICML 2024 · 286 citations
- Opportunities and Barriers for AI Feedback on Meeting Inclusion in Socioorganizational TeamsMo Houtti, Moyan Zhou, Daniel Runningen, Surabhi Sunil et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Sensemaking in Multi-Agent LLM Interfaces: How Users Interpret Transparency and Trustworthiness CuesSaumya Pareek, Jarod Govers, Naja Kathrine Kollerup, Emily Wong et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Rule Based Rewards for Language Model SafetyTong Mu, Alec Helyar, Johannes Heidecke, Joshua Achiam et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 159 citations
