Interspace Pruning: Using Adaptive Filter Representations to Improve Training of Sparse CNNs
Paul Wimmer, Jens Mehnert, Alexandru Condurache
Abstract
Unstructured pruning is well suited to reduce the memory footprint of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), both at training and inference time. CNNs contain parameters arranged in filters. Standard unstructured pruning (SP) reduces the memory footprint of CNNs by setting filter elements to zero, thereby specifying a fixed subspace that constrains the filter. Especially if pruning is applied before or during training, this induces a strong bias. To overcome this, we introduce interspace pruning (IP), a general tool to improve existing pruning methods. It uses filters represented in a dynamic interspace by linear combinations of an underlying adaptive filter basis (FB). For IP, FB coefficients are set to zero while un-pruned coefficients and FBs are trained jointly. In this work, we provide mathematical evidence for IP's superior performance and demonstrate that IP outperforms SP on all tested state-of-the-art unstructured pruning methods. Especially in challenging situations, like pruning for ImageNet or pruning to high sparsity, IP greatly exceeds SP with equal runtime and parameter costs. Finally, we show that advances of IP are due to improved trainability and superior generalization ability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1ec6a4ff-66cc-49e8-9ca4-5b0efd5fecc8Cited by top-tier papers4
- Towards Fairness-aware Adversarial Network PruningLei Zhang, Zhibo Wang, Xiaowei Dong, Yunhe Feng et al.ICCV 2023 · 8 citations
- Variance-Based Pruning for Accelerating and Compressing Trained NetworksUranik Berisha, Jens Mehnert, Alexandru Paul ConduracheICCV 2025 · 7 citations
- MAP: MAsk-Pruning for Source-Free Model Intellectual Property ProtectionBoyang Peng, Sanqing Qu, Yong Wu, Tianpei Zou et al.CVPR 2024 · 6 citations
- Solving Oscillation Problem in Post-Training Quantization Through a Theoretical PerspectiveYuexiao Ma, Huixia Li, Xiawu Zheng, Xuefeng Xiao et al.CVPR 2023
Builds on24
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
Related papers
- DPFPS: Dynamic and Progressive Filter Pruning for Compressing Convolutional Neural Networks from ScratchXiaofeng Ruan, Yufan Liu, Bing Li, Chunfeng Yuan et al.AAAI 2021 · 49 citations
- Pruning from ScratchYulong Wang, Xiaolu Zhang, Lingxi Xie, Jun Zhou et al.AAAI 2020 · 219 citations
- ResRep: Lossless CNN Pruning via Decoupling Remembering and ForgettingXiaohan Ding, Tianxiang Hao, Jianchao Tan, Ji Liu et al.ICCV 2021 · 202 citations
- Bias in Pruned Vision Models: In-Depth Analysis and CountermeasuresEugenia Iofinova, Alexandra Peste, Dan AlistarhCVPR 2023
- Unified Data-Free Compression: Pruning and Quantization without Fine-TuningShipeng Bai, Jun Chen, Xintian Shen, Yixuan Qian et al.ICCV 2023 · 31 citations
