MAP: MAsk-Pruning for Source-Free Model Intellectual Property Protection
Boyang Peng, Sanqing Qu, Yong Wu, Tianpei Zou, Lianghua He, Alois Knoll, Guang Chen, Changjun Jiang
Abstract
Deep learning has achieved remarkable progress in various applications, heightening the importance of safeguarding the intellectual property (IP) of well-trained models. It entails not only authorizing usage but also ensuring the deployment of models in authorized data domains, i.e., making models exclusive to certain target domains. Previous methods necessitate concurrent access to source training data and target unauthorized data when performing IP protection, making them risky and inefficient for decentralized private data. In this paper, we target a practical setting where only a well-trained source model is available and investigate how we can realize IP protection. To achieve this, we propose a novel MAsk Pruning (MAP) framework. MAP stems from an intuitive hypothesis, i.e., there are target-related parameters in a well-trained model, locating and pruning them is the key to IP protection. Technically, MAP freezes the source model and learns a target-specific binary mask to prevent unauthorized data usage while minimizing performance degradation on authorized data. Moreover, we introduce a new metric aimed at achieving a better balance between source and target performance degradation. To verify the effectiveness and versatility, we have evaluated MAP in a variety of scenarios, including vanilla source-available, practical source-free, and challenging data-free. Extensive experiments indicate that MAP yields new state-of-the-art performance. Code will be available at https://github.com/ispc-lab/MAP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2213d569-4d5d-4130-97cc-a42b3df78a0bCited by top-tier papers2
- OOD-Barrier: Build a Middle-Barrier for Open-Set Single-Image Test Time Adaptation via Vision Language ModelsBoyang Peng, Sanqing Qu, Tianpei Zou, Fan Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Jailbreaking the Non-Transferable Barrier via Test-Time Data DisguisingYongli Xiang, Ziming Hong, Lina Yao, Dadong Wang et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on22
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationJian Liang, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi FengICML 2020 · 1,624 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
Related papers
- Model Watermarking for Image Processing NetworksJie Zhang, Dongdong Chen, Jing Liao, Han Fang et al.AAAI 2020 · 160 citations
- Hardware-Assisted Intellectual Property Protection of Deep Learning ModelsAbhishek Chakraborty, Ankit Mondal, Ankur SrivastavaDAC 2020 · 75 citations
- ActiveDaemon: Unconscious DNN Dormancy and Waking Up via User-specific Invisible TokenGe Ren, Gaolei Li, Shenghong Li, Libo Chen et al.NDSS 2024
- IPRemover: A Generative Model Inversion Attack against Deep Neural Network Fingerprinting and WatermarkingWei Zong, Yang-Wai Chow, Willy Susilo, Joonsang Baek et al.AAAI 2024 · 12 citations
- Non-Transferable Learning: A New Approach for Model Ownership Verification and Applicability AuthorizationLixu Wang, Shichao Xu, Ruiqi Xu, Xiao Wang et al.ICLR 2022 · 65 citations
