Towards Fairness-aware Adversarial Network Pruning
Lei Zhang, Zhibo Wang, Xiaowei Dong, Yunhe Feng, Xiaoyi Pang, Zhifei Zhang, Kui Ren
Abstract
Network pruning aims to compress models while minimizing loss in accuracy. With the increasing focus on bias in AI systems, the bias inheriting or even magnification nature of traditional network pruning methods has raised a new perspective towards fairness-aware network pruning. Straightforward pruning plus debias methods and recent designs for monitoring disparities of demographic attributes during pruning have endeavored to enhance fairness in pruning. However, neither simple assembling of two tasks nor specifically designed pruning strategies could achieve the optimal trade-off among pruning ratio, accuracy, and fairness. This paper proposes an end-to-end learnable framework for fairness-aware network pruning, which optimizes both pruning and debias tasks jointly by adversarial training against those final evaluation metrics like accuracy for pruning, and disparate impact (DI) and equalized odds (DEO) for fairness. In other words, our fairness-aware adversarial pruning method would learn to prune without any handcraft rules. Therefore, our approach could flexibly adapt to variate network structures. Exhaustive experimentation demonstrates the generalization capacity of our approach, as well as superior performance on pruning and debias simultaneously. To highlight, the proposed method could preserve the SOTA pruning performance while significantly improving fairness by around 50% as compared to traditional pruning methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 60df141f-5edb-49a5-85df-5a19ea2c6fbfBuilds on13
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- Drawing Early-Bird Tickets: Toward More Efficient Training of Deep NetworksHaoran You, Chaojian Li, Pengfei Xu, Yonggan Fu et al.ICLR 2020 · 282 citations
- HYDRA: Pruning Adversarially Robust Neural NetworksVikash Sehwag, Shiqi Wang, Prateek Mittal, Suman JanaNeurIPS 2020 · 242 citations
- ResRep: Lossless CNN Pruning via Decoupling Remembering and ForgettingXiaohan Ding, Tianxiang Hao, Jianchao Tan, Ji Liu et al.ICCV 2021 · 202 citations
- FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust TrainingYuji Roh, Kangwook Lee, Steven Whang, Changho SuhICML 2020 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Pruning has a disparate impact on model accuracyCuong Tran, Ferdinando Fioretto, Jung-Eun Kim, Rakshit NaiduNeurIPS 2022 · 64 citations
- Balancing Act: Constraining Disparate Impact in Sparse ModelsMeraj Hashemizadeh, Juan Ramirez, Rohan Sukumaran, Golnoosh Farnadi et al.ICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- Bias In, Bias Out? Finding Unbiased Subnetworks in Vanilla ModelsIvan Luiz De Moura Matos, Abdel Djalil Sad Saoud, Ekaterina Lakovleva, Vito Paolo Pastore et al.CVPR 2026
- Controllable Feature Whitening for Hyperparameter-Free Bias MitigationYooshin Cho, Hanbyel Cho, Janghyeon Lee, Hyeong Gwon Hong et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- Rethinking Pruning for Accelerating Deep Inference At the EdgeDawei Gao, Xiaoxi He, Zimu Zhou, Yongxin Tong et al.KDD 2020 · 24 citations
