Bias In, Bias Out? Finding Unbiased Subnetworks in Vanilla Models
Ivan Luiz De Moura Matos, Abdel Djalil Sad Saoud, Ekaterina Lakovleva, Vito Paolo Pastore, Enzo Tartaglione
Abstract
The issue of algorithmic biases in deep learning has led to the development of various debiasing techniques, many of which perform complex training procedures or dataset manipulation. However, an intriguing question arises: is it possible to extract fair and bias-agnostic subnetworks from standard vanilla-trained models without relying on additional data, such as unbiased training set? In this work, we introduce Bias-Invariant Subnetwork Extraction (BISE), a learning strategy that identifies and isolates "bias-free" subnetworks that already exist within conventionally trained models, without retraining or finetuning the original parameters. Our approach demonstrates that such subnetworks can be extracted via pruning and can operate without modification, effectively relying less on biased features and maintaining robust performance. Our findings contribute towards efficient bias mitigation through structural adaptation of pre-trained neural networks via parameter removal, as opposed to costly strategies that are either data-centric or involve (re)training all model parameters. Extensive experiments on common benchmarks show the advantages of our approach in terms of the performance and computational efficiency of the resulting debiased model. The code is available at: https://github.com/ivanluizmatos/BISE.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6925f47b-6f23-4835-ae20-7575ada79cfbBuilds on39
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan et al.ICML 2021 · 683 citations
Related papers
- Training Debiased Subnetworks with Contrastive Weight PruningGeon Yeong Park, Sangmin Lee, Sang Wan Lee, Jong Chul YeCVPR 2023
- Towards Fairness-aware Adversarial Network PruningLei Zhang, Zhibo Wang, Xiaowei Dong, Yunhe Feng et al.ICCV 2023 · 8 citations
- FairDeDup: Detecting and Mitigating Vision-Language Fairness Disparities in Semantic Dataset DeduplicationEric Slyman, Stefan Lee, Scott Cohen, Kushal KafleCVPR 2024 · 3 citations
- Mitigating Gender Bias in Face Recognition using the von Mises-Fisher Mixture ModelJean-Rémy Conti, Nathan Noiry, Stéphan Clémençon, Vincent Despiegel et al.ICML 2022 · 16 citations
- Fair Infinitesimal Jackknife: Mitigating the Influence of Biased Training Data Points Without RefittingPrasanna Sattigeri, Soumya Ghosh, Inkit Padhi, Pierre L. Dognin et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
