Generative AI Uses and Risks for Knowledge Workers in a Science Organization
Kelly B. Wagman, Matthew T. Dearing, Marshini Chetty
Abstract
Generative AI could enhance scientific discovery by supporting knowledge workers in science organizations. However, the realworld applications and perceived concerns of generative AI use in these organizations are uncertain. In this paper, we report on a collaborative study with a US national laboratory with employees spanning Science and Operations about their use of generative AI tools. We surveyed 66 employees, interviewed a subset (N=22), and measured early adoption of an internal generative AI interface called Argo lab-wide. We have four findings: (1) Argo usage data shows small but increasing use by Science and Operations employees; Common current and envisioned use cases for generative AI in this context conceptually fall into either a (2) copilot or (3) workflow agent modality; and (4) Concerns include sensitive data security, academic publishing, and job impacts. Based on our findings, we make recommendations for generative AI use in science and other organizations.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 10004911-67af-42e2-9abf-25a4e7faed24Cited by top-tier papers3
- Investigating AI-induced Technostress and Coping Strategies of ProfessionalsHeesung Kwon, Jeesun Oh, Suyoun Lee, Sunok Lee et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Futuring Social Assemblages: How Enmeshing AIs into Social Life Challenges the Individual and the InterpersonalLingqing Wang, Yingting Gao, Chidimma Lois Anyi, Ashok K. GoelCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Beyond the Desk: Barriers and Future Opportunities for AI to Assist Scientists in Embodied Physical TasksIrene Hou, Alexander Qin, Lauren Cheng, Philip J. GuoCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on16
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot's Code ContributionsHammond Pearce, Baleegh Ahmad, Benjamin Tan, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt et al.S&P 2022 · 725 citations
- Studying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory ProgrammingMajeed Kazemitabaar, Justin Chow, Carl Ka To Ma, Barbara J. Ericson et al.CHI 2023 · 348 citations
- Evaluating Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic HCI Research Data: a Case StudyPerttu Hämäläinen, Mikke Tavast, Anton KunnariCHI 2023 · 244 citations
Related papers
- When Your Boss Is an AI Bot: Exploring Opportunities and Risks of Manager Clone Agents in the Future WorkplaceQing Hu, Qing Xiao, Hancheng Cao, Hong ShenCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Can GenAI Move from Individual Use to Collaborative Work? Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities of Coordinating GenAI into Collaborative NewsworkQing Xiao, Qing Hu, Jingjia Xiao, Hancheng Cao et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Exploring Collaborative GenAI Agents in Synchronous Group Settings: Eliciting Team Perceptions and Design Considerations for the Future of WorkJanet G. Johnson, Macarena Peralta, Mansanjam Kaur, Ruijie Sophia Huang et al.CSCW 2025 · 16 citations
- The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AILev Tankelevitch, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, Ava Elizabeth Scott et al.CHI 2024 · 279 citations
- How Tech Workers Contend with Hazards of Humanlikeness in Generative AIMark Diaz, Renee Shelby, Eric Corbett, Andrew SmartCHI 2026 · 1 citation
