Beyond the Desk: Barriers and Future Opportunities for AI to Assist Scientists in Embodied Physical Tasks
Irene Hou, Alexander Qin, Lauren Cheng, Philip J. Guo
Abstract
More scientists are now using AI, but prior studies have examined only how they use it ‘at the desk’ for computer-based work. However, given that scientific work often happens ‘beyond the desk’ at lab and field sites, we conducted the first study of how scientific practitioners use AI for embodied physical tasks. We interviewed 12 scientific practitioners doing hands-on lab and fieldwork in domains like nuclear fusion, primate cognition, and biochemistry, and found three barriers to AI adoption in these settings: 1) experimental setups are too high-stakes to risk AI errors, 2) constrained environments make it hard to use AI, and 3) AI cannot match the tacit knowledge of humans. Participants then developed speculative designs for future AI assistants to 1) monitor task status, 2) organize lab-wide knowledge, 3) monitor scientists’ health, 4) do field scouting, 5) do hands-on chores. Our findings point toward AI as background infrastructure to support physical work rather than replacing human expertise.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext da509726-8e7b-4b93-9a64-8a36eab7326fBuilds on15
- Understanding Design Collaboration Between Designers and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature ReviewYang Shi, Tian Gao, Xiaohan Jiao, Nan CaoCSCW 2023 · 170 citations
- Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-CreationSangho Suh, Meng Chen, Bryan Min, Toby Jia-Jun Li et al.CHI 2024 · 143 citations
- AI as Social Glue: Uncovering the Roles of Deep Generative AI during Social Music CompositionMinhyang (Mia) Suh, Emily Youngblom, Michael Terry, Carrie J. CaiCHI 2021 · 132 citations
- "What It Wants Me To Say": Bridging the Abstraction Gap Between End-User Programmers and Code-Generating Large Language ModelsMichael Xieyang Liu, Advait Sarkar, Carina Negreanu, Benjamin G. Zorn et al.CHI 2023 · 114 citations
- How AI Processing Delays Foster Creativity: Exploring Research Question Co-Creation with an LLM-based AgentYiren Liu, Si Chen, Haocong Cheng, Mengxia Yu et al.CHI 2024 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Generative AI Uses and Risks for Knowledge Workers in a Science OrganizationKelly B. Wagman, Matthew T. Dearing, Marshini ChettyCHI 2025 · 16 citations
- Towards Considerate Embodied AI: Co-Designing Situated Multi-Site Healthcare Robots from Abstract Concepts to High-Fidelity PrototypesYuanchen Bai, Ruixiang Han, Niti Parikh, Wendy Ju et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Situated Imaginaries: Designing AI Futures with Computer Science Teaching AssistantsGrace Barkhuff, Ian Pruitt, Vyshnavi Namani, William Gregory Johnson et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- The Promise and Peril of On-Device AI for Conservation WorkCynthia Dong, Emmanuel Azuh Mensah, Vaishnavi Ranganathan, Kurtis HeimerlCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- How Tech Workers Contend with Hazards of Humanlikeness in Generative AIMark Diaz, Renee Shelby, Eric Corbett, Andrew SmartCHI 2026 · 1 citation
