Measuring and Controlling Solution Degeneracy across Task-Trained Recurrent Neural Networks
Ann Huang, Satpreet Harcharan Singh, Flavio Martinelli, Kanaka Rajan
Abstract
Task-trained recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are widely used in neuroscience and machine learning to model dynamical computations. To gain mechanistic insight into how neural systems solve tasks, prior work often reverse-engineers individual trained networks. However, different RNNs trained on the same task and achieving similar performance can exhibit strikingly different internal solutions, a phenomenon known as solution degeneracy. Here, we develop a unified framework to systematically quantify and control solution degeneracy across three levels: behavior, neural dynamics, and weight space. We apply this framework to 3,400 RNNs trained on four neuroscience-relevant tasks: flip-flop memory, sine wave generation, delayed discrimination, and path integration, while systematically varying task complexity, learning regime, network size, and regularization. We find that higher task complexity and stronger feature learning reduce degeneracy in neural dynamics but increase it in weight space, with mixed effects on behavior. In contrast, larger networks and structural regularization reduce degeneracy at all three levels. These findings empirically validate the Contravariance Principle and provide practical guidance for researchers seeking to tune the variability of RNN solutions, either to uncover shared neural mechanisms or to model the individual variability observed in biological systems. This work provides a principled framework for quantifying and controlling solution degeneracy in task-trained RNNs, offering new tools for building more interpretable and biologically grounded models of neural computation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0b6636a3-15ea-4f14-9fb4-5403c4555f42Cited by top-tier papers5
- InputDSA: Demixing, then comparing recurrent and externally driven dynamicsAnn Huang, Mitchell Ostrow, Satpreet H. Singh, Leo Kozachkov et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Discovering alternative solutions beyond the simplicity bias in recurrent neural networksWilliam Qian, Cengiz PehlevanICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Language Statistics and False Belief Reasoning: Evidence from 41 Open-Weight LMsSean Trott, Samuel M. Taylor, Cameron Robert Jones, James A. Michaelov et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Identifying Connectivity Distributions from Neural Dynamics Using FlowsTimothy Kim, Ulises Obilinovic, Yiliu Wang, Eric SheaBrown et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Shaping Sequence Attractor Schema in Recurrent Neural NetworksZhikun Chu, Bo Ho, Xiaolong Zou, Yuanyuan MiNeurIPS 2025
Builds on21
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and DepthThao Nguyen, Maithra Raghu, Simon KornblithICLR 2021 · 323 citations
- Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural RepresentationsYamini Bansal, Preetum Nakkiran, Boaz BarakNeurIPS 2021 · 253 citations
- Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter TransferGe Yang, Edward J. Hu, Igor Babuschkin, Szymon Sidor et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 208 citations
- Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural RepresentationsAlex H. Williams, Erin Kunz, Simon Kornblith, Scott W. LindermanNeurIPS 2021 · 182 citations
Related papers
- Charting and Navigating the Space of Solutions for Recurrent Neural NetworksElia Turner, Kabir V. Dabholkar, Omri BarakNeurIPS 2021 · 33 citations
- Learning rule influences recurrent network representations but not attractor structure in decision-making tasksBrandon McMahan, Michael Kleinman, Jonathan C. KaoNeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations
- Setting up for failure: automatic discovery of the neural mechanisms of cognitive errorsPuria Radmard, Paul M. Bays, Máté LengyelICLR 2026
- Learning dynamics in linear recurrent neural networksAlexandra Maria Proca, Clémentine Carla Juliette Dominé, Murray Shanahan, Pedro A. M. MedianoICML 2025
- Training biologically plausible recurrent neural networks on cognitive tasks with long-term dependenciesWayne Soo, Vishwa Goudar, Xiao-Jing WangNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
