Identifying Connectivity Distributions from Neural Dynamics Using Flows
Timothy Kim, Ulises Obilinovic, Yiliu Wang, Eric SheaBrown, Uygar Sümbül
Abstract
Connectivity structure shapes neural computation, but inferring this structure from population recordings is degenerate: multiple connectivity structures can generate identical dynamics. Recent work uses low-rank recurrent neural networks (lr-RNNs) to infer low-dimensional latent dynamics and connectivity from observed activity, enabling a mechanistic interpretation of the dynamics. However, standard approaches for training lrRNNs can recover spurious structures irrelevant to the underlying dynamics. We first characterize the identifiability of connectivity structures in lr-RNNs and determine conditions under which a unique solution exists. To find such solutions, we develop an inference framework based on maximum entropy and continuous normalizing flows (CNFs), trained via flow matching. Instead of estimating a single connectivity matrix, our method learns a distribution over connection weights that is maximally unbiased over unidentifiable components while matching the observed dynamics. This approach captures complex yet necessary distributions such as heavy-tailed connectivity found in empirical data. We validate our method on synthetic datasets with connectivity structures that generate multistable attractors, limit cycles, and ring attractors, and demonstrate its applicability in recordings from rat frontal cortex during decision-making. Our framework shifts circuit inference from recovering connectivity to identifying which connectivity structures are computationally required, and which are artifacts of underconstrained inference.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f98ac925-0e18-42f4-854a-d1fa598ddcd4Builds on10
- Flow Matching for Generative ModelingYaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel et al.ICLR 2023 · 87 citations
- Extracting computational mechanisms from neural data using low-rank RNNsAdrian Valente, Jonathan W. Pillow, Srdjan OstojicNeurIPS 2022 · 71 citations
- Inferring stochastic low-rank recurrent neural networks from neural dataMatthijs Pals, A Erdem Sagtekin, Felix Pei, Manuel Glöckler et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- Low Tensor Rank Learning of Neural DynamicsArthur Pellegrino, N. Alex Cayco-Gajic, Angus ChadwickNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Measuring and Controlling Solution Degeneracy across Task-Trained Recurrent Neural NetworksAnn Huang, Satpreet Harcharan Singh, Flavio Martinelli, Kanaka RajanNeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Flow-field inference from neural data using deep recurrent networksTimothy Doyeon Kim, Thomas Zhihao Luo, Tankut Can, Kamesh Krishnamurthy et al.ICML 2025
- Self-Supervised Discovery of Neural Circuits in Spatially Patterned Neural Responses with Graph Neural NetworksKijung YoonNeurIPS 2025
- A Factorized Low-Rank RNN Framework for Uncovering Independent Neural Latent Dynamics and ConnectivityChengrui Li, Yunmiao Wang, Yule Wang, Weihan Li et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Partial observation can induce mechanistic mismatches in data-constrained models of neural dynamicsWilliam Qian, Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth, Benjamin S. Ruben, Cengiz PehlevanNeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- Mechanistic Interpretability of RNNs emulating Hidden Markov ModelsElia Torre, Michele Viscione, Lucas Pompe, Benjamin F. Grewe et al.NeurIPS 2025
