Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representations
Alex H. Williams, Erin Kunz, Simon Kornblith, Scott W. Linderman
Abstract
Understanding the operation of biological and artificial networks remains a difficult and important challenge. To identify general principles, researchers are increasingly interested in surveying large collections of networks that are trained on, or biologically adapted to, similar tasks. A standardized set of analysis tools is now needed to identify how network-level covariates-such as architecture, anatomical brain region, and model organism-impact neural representations (hidden layer activations). Here, we provide a rigorous foundation for these analyses by defining a broad family of metric spaces that quantify representational dissimilarity. Using this framework, we modify existing representational similarity measures based on canonical correlation analysis and centered kernel alignment to satisfy the triangle inequality, formulate a novel metric that respects the inductive biases in convolutional layers, and identify approximate Euclidean embeddings that enable network representations to be incorporated into essentially any off-the-shelf machine learning method. We demonstrate these methods on large-scale datasets from biology (Allen Institute Brain Observatory) and deep learning (NAS-Bench-101). In doing so, we identify relationships between neural representations that are interpretable in terms of anatomical features and model performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b1949352-887c-4e43-98fe-5cca5d132a90Cited by top-tier papers48
- Deep Model ReassemblyXingyi Yang, Daquan Zhou, Songhua Liu, Jingwen Ye et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 162 citations
- On the Symmetries of Deep Learning Models and their Internal RepresentationsCharles Godfrey, Davis Brown, Tegan Emerson, Henry KvingeNeurIPS 2022 · 78 citations
- Beyond Geometry: Comparing the Temporal Structure of Computation in Neural Circuits with Dynamical Similarity AnalysisMitchell Ostrow, Adam Eisen, Leo Kozachkov, Ila FieteNeurIPS 2023 · 60 citations
- Latent Space Translation via Semantic AlignmentValentino Maiorca, Luca Moschella, Antonio Norelli, Marco Fumero et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 59 citations
- The Tunnel Effect: Building Data Representations in Deep Neural NetworksWojciech Masarczyk, Mateusz Ostaszewski, Ehsan Imani, Razvan Pascanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 40 citations
Builds on4
- Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and DepthThao Nguyen, Maithra Raghu, Simon KornblithICLR 2021 · 323 citations
- Topological AutoencodersMichael Moor, Max Horn, Bastian Rieck, Karsten M. BorgwardtICML 2020 · 192 citations
- On Linear Identifiability of Learned RepresentationsGeoffrey Roeder, Luke Metz, Durk KingmaICML 2021 · 107 citations
- Manifold GPLVMs for discovering non-Euclidean latent structure in neural dataKristopher T. Jensen, Ta-Chu Kao, Marco Tripodi, Guillaume HennequinNeurIPS 2020 · 37 citations
Related papers
- Grounding Representation Similarity Through Statistical TestingFrances Ding, Jean-Stanislas Denain, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2021 · 88 citations
- Deconfounded Representation Similarity for Comparison of Neural NetworksTianyu Cui, Yogesh Kumar, Pekka Marttinen, Samuel KaskiNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- Representational Dissimilarity Metric Spaces for Stochastic Neural NetworksLyndon R. Duong, Jingyang Zhou, Josue Nassar, Jules Berman et al.ICLR 2023 · 9 citations
- Normalized Space Alignment: A Versatile Metric for Representation AnalysisDanish Ebadulla, Aditya Gulati, Ambuj K. SinghKDD 2025
- Local Intrinsic Dimension of Representations Predicts Alignment and Generalization in AI Models and Human BrainJunjie Yu, Wenxiao Ma, Chen Wei, Jianyu Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
