Lune

EMNLP2025Top-tier venue

The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring The Language Gap To Mitigating It

Zheng Xin Yong, Beyza Ermis, Marzieh Fadaee, Stephen H. Bach, Julia Kreutzer

2025Year
2Citations
3Top-tier citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the linguistic diversity of LLM safety research, highlighting the English-centric nature of the field. Through a systematic review of nearly 300 publications from 2020-2024 across major NLP conferences and workshops at * ACL, we identify a significant and growing language gap in LLM safety research, with even high-resource non-English languages receiving minimal attention. We further observe that non-English languages are rarely studied as a standalone language and that English safety research exhibits poor language documentation practice. To motivate future research into multilingual safety, we make several recommendations based on our survey, and we then pose three concrete future directions on safety evaluation, training data generation, and crosslingual safety generalization. Based on our survey and proposed directions, the field can develop more robust, inclusive AI safety practices for diverse global populations. Content Warning: This paper contains examples of harmful language.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 08d50d7c-e905-4ec3-9ce1-0d9d80c34268

Cited by top-tier papers3

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on20

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines