Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)
Usha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Suraj Srinivas, Flávio P. Calmon, Himabindu Lakkaraju
Abstract
CLIP embeddings have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of multimodal applications. However, these high-dimensional, dense vector representations are not easily interpretable, limiting our understanding of the rich structure of CLIP and its use in downstream applications that require transparency. In this work, we show that the semantic structure of CLIP's latent space can be leveraged to provide interpretability, allowing for the decomposition of representations into semantic concepts. We formulate this problem as one of sparse recovery and propose a novel method, Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings, for transforming CLIP representations into sparse linear combinations of human-interpretable concepts. Distinct from previous work, SpLiCE is task-agnostic and can be used, without training, to explain and even replace traditional dense CLIP representations, maintaining high downstream performance while significantly improving their interpretability. We also demonstrate significant use cases of SpLiCE representations including detecting spurious correlations and model editing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 050fcd87-359b-44d3-8e16-cd1e038efff0Cited by top-tier papers46
- Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language ModelsMateusz Pach, Shyamgopal Karthik, Quentin Bouniot, Serge J. Belongie et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 79 citations
- CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modallyDarina Koishigarina, Arnas Uselis, Seong Joon OhICLR 2026 · 33 citations
- Crafting Interpretable Embeddings for Language Neuroscience by Asking LLMs QuestionsVinamra Benara, Chandan Singh, John X. Morris, Richard J. Antonello et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- Scendi Score: Prompt-Aware Diversity Evaluation Via Schur Complement of Clip EmbeddingsAzim Ospanov, Mohammad Jalali, Farzan FarniaICCV 2025 · 17 citations
- VL-SAE: Interpreting and Enhancing Vision-Language Alignment with a Unified Concept SetShufan Shen, Junshu Sun, Qingming Huang, Shuhui WangNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
Builds on17
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation LearningWeixin Liang, Yuhui Zhang, Yongchan Kwon, Serena Yeung et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 834 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based DecompositionYossi Gandelsman, Alexei A. Efros, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2024 · 179 citations
Related papers
- From Causal to Concept-Based Representation LearningGoutham Rajendran, Simon Buchholz, Bryon Aragam, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
- Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive LearningChuan Qin, Constantin Venhoff, Sonia Joseph, Fanyi Xiao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Advancing Interpretability of CLIP Representations with Concept Surrogate ModelNhat Hoang-Xuan, Xiyuan Wei, Wanli Xing, Tianbao Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image RepresentationsNeha Mukund Kalibhat, Shweta Bhardwaj, C. Bayan Bruss, Hamed Firooz et al.ICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Decoding Dense Embeddings: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting and Discretizing Dense RetrievalSeongwan Park, Taeklim Kim, Youngjoong KoEMNLP 2025
