CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modally
Darina Koishigarina, Arnas Uselis, Seong Joon Oh
Abstract
CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) has become a popular choice for various downstream tasks. However, recent studies have questioned its ability to represent compositional concepts effectively. These works suggest that CLIP often acts like a bag-of-words (BoW) model, interpreting images and text as sets of individual concepts without grasping the structural relationships. In particular, CLIP struggles to correctly bind attributes to their corresponding objects when multiple objects are present in an image or text. In this work, we investigate why CLIP exhibits this BoW-like behavior. Our key finding is that CLIP does not lack binding information. Through linear probing, robustness tests with increasing object counts, and conjunctive search experiments, we show that attribute-object bindings are already encoded within CLIP's text and image embeddings. The weakness lies in the cross-modal alignment, which fails to preserve this information. We show it can be accessed cross-modally with a simple linear transformation to text embeddings. This improves CLIP's attributeobject binding performance and confirms that the information was already encoded unimodally. In practice, this means CLIP-based systems can be enhanced with a lightweight linear layer trained on existing embeddings, avoiding costly encoder retraining. The code is available at https://github.com/kdariina/ CLIP-not-BoW-unimodally .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7ff57812-a573-4a45-b0e3-adc981be8369Cited by top-tier papers13
- Noise Matters: Optimizing Matching Noise for Diffusion ClassifiersYanghao Wang, Long ChenNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Not Just What's There: Enabling CLIP to Comprehend Negated Visual Descriptions Without Fine-TuningJunhao Xiao, Zhiyu Wu, Hao Lin, Yi Chen et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- On the rankability of visual embeddingsAnkit Sonthalia, Arnas Uselis, Seong Joon OhNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- VisRet: Visualization Improves Knowledge-Intensive Text-to-Image RetrievalDi Wu, Yixin Wan, Kai-Wei ChangACL 2026 · 3 citations
- DeLeaker: Dynamic Inference-Time Reweighting For Semantic Leakage Mitigation in Text-to-Image ModelsMor Ventura, Michael Toker, Or Patashnik, Yonatan Belinkov et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on21
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation LearningWeixin Liang, Yuhui Zhang, Yongchan Kwon, Serena Yeung et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 834 citations
- Teaching CLIP to Count to TenRoni Paiss, Ariel Ephrat, Omer Tov, Shiran Zada et al.ICCV 2023 · 196 citations
- Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic CompositionalityTristan Thrush, Ryan Jiang, Max Bartolo, Amanpreet Singh et al.CVPR 2022 · 179 citations
Related papers
- How can embedding models bind concepts?Arnas Uselis, Darina Koishigarina, Seong Joon OhICML 2026
- Non-Contrastive Learning Meets Language-Image Pre-TrainingJinghao Zhou, Li Dong, Zhe Gan, Lijuan Wang et al.CVPR 2023
- HiCLIP: Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining with Hierarchy-aware AttentionShijie Geng, Jianbo Yuan, Yu Tian, Yuxiao Chen et al.ICLR 2023 · 11 citations
- Mitigate the Gap: Improving Cross-Modal Alignment in CLIPSedigheh Eslami, Gerard de MeloICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Interpreting and Analysing CLIP's Zero-Shot Image Classification via Mutual KnowledgeFawaz Sammani, Nikos DeligiannisNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
