From Causal to Concept-Based Representation Learning
Goutham Rajendran, Simon Buchholz, Bryon Aragam, Bernhard Schölkopf, Pradeep Ravikumar
Abstract
To build intelligent machine learning systems, modern representation learning attempts to recover latent generative factors from data, such as in causal representation learning. A key question in this growing field is to provide rigorous conditions under which latent factors can be identified and thus, potentially learned. Motivated by extensive empirical literature on linear representations and concept learning, we propose to relax causal notions with a geometric notion of concepts. We formally define a notion of concepts and show rigorously that they can be provably recovered from diverse data. Instead of imposing assumptions on the “true” generative latent space, we assume that concepts can be represented linearly in this latent space. The tradeoff is that instead of identifying the “true” generative factors, we identify a subset of desired human-interpretable concepts that are relevant for a given application. Experiments on synthetic data, multimodal CLIP models and large language models supplement our results and show the utility of our approach. In this way, we provide a foundation for moving from causal representations to interpretable, concept-based representations by bringing together ideas from these two neighboring disciplines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e9e58cab-fe0b-4259-b408-e3925bd33b5cCited by top-tier papers8
- I Predict Therefore I Am: Is Next Token Prediction Enough to Learn Human-Interpretable Concepts from Data?Yuhang Liu, Dong Gong, Yichao Cai, Erdun Gao et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Shortcuts and Identifiability in Concept-based Models from a Neuro-Symbolic LensSamuele Bortolotti, Emanuele Marconato, Paolo Morettin, Andrea Passerini et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Sample-efficient Learning of Concepts with Theoretical Guarantees: from Data to Concepts without InterventionsHidde Fokkema, Tim van Erven, Sara MagliacaneNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Revealing Multimodal Causality with Large Language ModelsJin Li, Shoujin Wang, Qi Zhang, Feng Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Nonparametric Identification of Latent ConceptsYujia Zheng, Shaoan Xie, Kun ZhangICML 2025
Builds on48
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
Related papers
- Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)Usha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Suraj Srinivas, Flávio P. Calmon et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 146 citations
- Necessary Conditions for Compositional Generalization of Embedding ModelsArnas Uselis, Andrea Dittadi, Seong Joon OhICML 2026
- Beyond DAGs: A Latent Partial Causal Model for Multimodal LearningYuhang Liu, Zhen Zhang, Dong Gong, Erdun Gao et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- Causal Differentiating Concepts: Interpreting LM Behavior via Causal Representation LearningNavita Goyal, Hal Daumé III, Alexandre Drouin, Dhanya SridharNeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
