Bid Prediction in Repeated Auctions with Learning
Gali Noti, Vasilis Syrgkanis
Abstract
We consider the problem of bid prediction in repeated auctions and evaluate the performance of econometric methods for learning agents using a dataset from a mainstream sponsored search auction marketplace. Sponsored search auctions is a billion dollar industry and the main source of revenue of several tech giants. A critical problem in optimizing such marketplaces is understanding how bidders will react to changes in the auction design. We propose the use of no-regret based econometrics for bid prediction, modeling players as no-regret learners with respect to a utility function, unknown to the analyst. We propose new econometric approaches to simultaneously learn the parameters of a player's utility and her learning rule, and apply these methods in a real-world dataset from the BingAds sponsored search auction marketplace. We show that the no-regret econometric methods perform comparable to state-of-the-art time-series machine learning methods when there is no co-variate shift, but significantly outperform machine learning methods when there is a co-variate shift between the training and test periods. This portrays the importance of using structural econometric approaches in predicting how players will respond to changes in the market. Moreover, we show that among structural econometric methods, approaches based on no-regret learning outperform more traditional, equilibrium-based, econometric methods that assume that players continuously best-respond to competition. Finally, we demonstrate how the prediction performance of the no-regret learning algorithms can be further improved by considering bidders who optimize a utility function with a visibility bias component.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 044c4782-34fb-4a5a-bcf1-a514994b18a2Cited by top-tier papers14
- Auctions between Regret-Minimizing AgentsYoav Kolumbus, Noam NisanWWW 2022 · 47 citations
- Contracting with a Learning AgentGuru Guruganesh, Yoav Kolumbus, Jon Schneider, Inbal Talgam-Cohen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 38 citations
- Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertisers✱Zhe Feng, Swati Padmanabhan, Di WangWWW 2023 · 38 citations
- How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning AgentsYoav Kolumbus, Noam NisanNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
- Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learnersAngelos Assos, Yuval Dagan, Constantinos DaskalakisNeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Reinforcement Mechanism Design: With Applications to Dynamic Pricing in Sponsored Search AuctionsWeiran Shen, Binghui Peng, Hanpeng Liu, Michael Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 12 citations
- Robust Budget Pacing with a Single SampleSantiago R. Balseiro, Rachitesh Kumar, Vahab Mirrokni, Balasubramanian Sivan et al.ICML 2023 · 7 citations
- The (Marginal) Value of a Search Ad: An Online Causal Framework for Repeated Second-price AuctionsYuxiao Wen, Zihao Hu, Yanjun Han, Yuan YAO et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Convergence Analysis of No-Regret Bidding Algorithms in Repeated AuctionsZhe Feng, Guru Guruganesh, Christopher Liaw, Aranyak Mehta et al.AAAI 2021 · 31 citations
- No-Regret Online Autobidding Algorithms in First-price AuctionsYilin Li, Yuan Deng, Wei Tang, Hanrui ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
