Contracting with a Learning Agent
Guru Guruganesh, Yoav Kolumbus, Jon Schneider, Inbal Talgam-Cohen, Emmanouil-Vasileios Vlatakis-Gkaragkounis, Joshua R. Wang, S. Matthew Weinberg
Abstract
Many real-life contractual relations differ completely from the clean, static model at the heart of principal-agent theory. Typically, they involve repeated strategic interactions of the principal and agent, taking place under uncertainty and over time. While appealing in theory, players seldom use complex dynamic strategies in practice, often preferring to circumvent complexity and approach uncertainty through learning. We initiate the study of repeated contracts with a learning agent, focusing on agents who achieve no-regret outcomes. Optimizing against a no-regret agent is a known open problem in general games; we achieve an optimal solution to this problem for a canonical contract setting, in which the agent's choice among multiple actions leads to success/failure. The solution has a surprisingly simple structure: for some , initially offer the agent a linear contract with scalar , then switch to offering a linear contract with scalar . This switch causes the agent to ``free-fall'' through their action space and during this time provides the principal with non-zero reward at zero cost. Despite apparent exploitation of the agent, this dynamic contract can leave both players better off compared to the best static contract. Our results generalize beyond success/failure, to arbitrary non-linear contracts which the principal rescales dynamically. Finally, we quantify the dependence of our results on knowledge of the time horizon, and are the first to address this consideration in the study of strategizing against learning agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dfb3f5cb-5363-4611-8775-3cb3c599f4f1Cited by top-tier papers9
- Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learnersAngelos Assos, Yuval Dagan, Constantinos DaskalakisNeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
- Is Knowledge Power? On the (Im)possibility of Learning from Strategic InteractionsNivasini Ananthakrishnan, Nika Haghtalab, Chara Podimata, Kunhe YangNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Impact of Decentralized Learning on Player Utilities in Stackelberg GamesKate Donahue, Nicole Immorlica, Meena Jagadeesan, Brendan Lucier et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight RationalityAntoine Scheid, Aymeric Capitaine, Etienne Boursier, Eric Moulines et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource ConstraintsDaniel Jarne Ornia, Nicholas Bishop, Joel Dyer, Wei-Chen Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on16
- No-Regret Learning and Mixed Nash Equilibria: They Do Not MixEmmanouil V. Vlatakis-Gkaragkounis, Lampros Flokas, Thanasis Lianeas, Panayotis Mertikopoulos et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 100 citations
- Strategic Classification in the DarkGanesh Ghalme, Vineet Nair, Itay Eilat, Inbal Talgam-Cohen et al.ICML 2021 · 70 citations
- Auctions between Regret-Minimizing AgentsYoav Kolumbus, Noam NisanWWW 2022 · 47 citations
- How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning AgentsYoav Kolumbus, Noam NisanNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
- Is Learning in Games Good for the Learners?William Brown, Jon Schneider, Kiran VodrahalliNeurIPS 2023 · 27 citations
Related papers
- Learning Optimal Contracts: How to Exploit Small Action SpacesFrancesco Bacchiocchi, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi, Nicola GattiICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Generalized Principal-Agent Problem with a Learning AgentTao Lin, Yiling ChenICLR 2025
- Learning to Incentivize in Repeated Principal-Agent Problems with Adversarial Agent ArrivalsJunyan Liu, Arnab Maiti, Artin Tajdini, Kevin Jamieson et al.ICML 2025
- Incentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit GamesAntoine Scheid, Daniil Tiapkin, Etienne Boursier, Aymeric Capitaine et al.ICML 2024 · 17 citations
- Contract Design Under Approximate Best ResponsesFrancesco Bacchiocchi, Jiarui Gan, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi et al.ICML 2025
