VAL: Interactive Task Learning with GPT Dialog Parsing
Lane Lawley, Christopher MacLellan
Abstract
Machine learning often requires millions of examples to produce static, black-box models. In contrast, interactive task learning (ITL) emphasizes incremental knowledge acquisition from limited instruction provided by humans in modalities such as natural language. However, ITL systems often suffer from brittle, error-prone language parsing, which limits their usability. Large language models (LLMs) are resistant to brittleness but are not interpretable and cannot learn incrementally. We present VAL, an ITL system with a new philosophy for LLM/symbolic integration. By using LLMs only for specific tasks—such as predicate and argument selection—within an algorithmic framework, VAL reaps the benefits of LLMs to support interactive learning of hierarchical task knowledge from natural language. Acquired knowledge is human interpretable and generalizes to support execution of novel tasks without additional training. We studied users’ interactions with VAL in a video game setting, finding that most users could successfully teach VAL using language they felt was natural.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 01a74b6d-7906-402e-8a45-52b453ab1de4Cited by top-tier papers6
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About ItNanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra SelvanCHI 2025 · 33 citations
- From Operation to Cognition: Automatic Modeling Cognitive Dependencies from User Demonstrations for GUI Task AutomationYiwen Yin, Yu Mei, Chun Yu, Toby Jia-Jun Li et al.CHI 2025 · 8 citations
- Cocoa: Co-Planning and Co-Execution with AI AgentsK. J. Kevin Feng, Kevin Pu, Matt Latzke, Tal August et al.CHI 2026 · 6 citations
- STAND: Self-Aware Precondition Induction for Interactive Task LearningDaniel Weitekamp, Glen Smith, Ken Koedinger, Christopher MacLellanICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on7
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model PromptsTongshuang Wu, Michael Terry, Carrie Jun CaiCHI 2022 · 465 citations
- ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language ModelsCeyao Zhang, Kaijie Yang, Siyi Hu, Zihao Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 141 citations
Related papers
- Large Language Models are Interpretable LearnersRuochen Wang, Si Si, Felix X. Yu, Dorothea Wiesmann Rothuizen et al.ICLR 2025
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
- DiLLS: Interactive Diagnosis of LLM-based Multi-agent Systems via Layered Summary of Agent BehaviorsRui Sheng, Yukun Yang, Chuhan Shi, Yanna Lin et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Symbolic Planning and Code Generation for Grounded DialogueJustin T. Chiu, Wenting Zhao, Derek Chen, Saujas Vaduguru et al.EMNLP 2023
- Towards Reliable Code-as-Policies: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Embodied Task PlanningSanghyun Ahn, Wonje Choi, Junyong Lee, Jinwoo Park et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
