Task-specific experimental design for treatment effect estimation
Bethany Connolly, Kim Moore, Tobias Schwedes, Alexander Adam, Gary Willis, Ilya Feige, Christopher Frye
Abstract
Understanding causality should be a core requirement of any attempt to build real impact through AI. Due to the inherent unobservability of counterfactuals, large randomised trials (RCTs) are the standard for causal inference. But large experiments are generically expensive, and randomisation carries its own costs, e.g. when suboptimal decisions are trialed. Recent work has proposed more sample-efficient alternatives to RCTs, but these are not adaptable to the downstream application for which the causal effect is sought. In this work, we develop a task-specific approach to experimental design and derive sampling strategies customised to particular downstream applications. Across a range of important tasks, real-world datasets, and sample sizes, our method outperforms other benchmarks, e.g. requiring an order-of-magnitude less data to match RCT performance on targeted marketing tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 00855338-f451-49df-8430-71f8ea28394aCited by top-tier papers3
- Experimental Design for Multi-Channel Imaging via Task-Driven Feature SelectionStefano B. Blumberg, Paddy J. Slator, Daniel C. AlexanderICLR 2024 · 1 citation
- ActiveCQ: Active Estimation of Causal QuantitiesErdun Gao, Dino SejdinovicICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Enhancing Treatment Effect Estimation via Active Learning: A Counterfactual Covering PerspectiveHechuan Wen, Tong Chen, Mingming Gong, Li Kheng Chai et al.ICML 2025
Builds on5
- Variational Adversarial Active LearningSamarth Sinha, Sayna Ebrahimi, Trevor DarrellICCV 2019 · 662 citations
- Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and not yet LearntSören Mindermann, Jan Markus Brauner, Muhammed Razzak, Mrinank Sharma et al.ICML 2022 · 237 citations
- Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational DataAndrew Jesson, Panagiotis Tigas, Joost van Amersfoort, Andreas Kirsch et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 42 citations
- Budgeted Heterogeneous Treatment Effect EstimationTian Qin, Tian-Zuo Wang, Zhi-Hua ZhouICML 2021 · 18 citations
- Sample Constrained Treatment Effect EstimationRaghavendra Addanki, David Arbour, Tung Mai, Cameron Musco et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Cost-effectively Identifying Causal Effects When Only Response Variable is ObservableTian-Zuo Wang, Xi-Zhu Wu, Sheng-Jun Huang, Zhi-Hua ZhouICML 2020 · 9 citations
- How and Why to Use Experimental Data to Evaluate Methods for Observational Causal InferenceAmanda Gentzel, Purva Pruthi, David D. JensenICML 2021 · 22 citations
- Smoke and Mirrors in Causal Downstream TasksRiccardo Cadei, Lukas Lindorfer, Sylvia Cremer, Cordelia Schmid et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- Data-driven Design of Randomized Control Trials with Guaranteed Treatment EffectsSantiago Cortes-Gomez, Naveen Janaki Raman, Aarti Singh, Bryan WilderICML 2025
- Language Models as Causal Effect GeneratorsLucius E. J. Bynum, Kyunghyun ChoEMNLP 2025
