Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Data
Andrew Jesson, Panagiotis Tigas, Joost van Amersfoort, Andreas Kirsch, Uri Shalit, Yarin Gal
Abstract
Estimating personalized treatment effects from high-dimensional observational data is essential in situations where experimental designs are infeasible, unethical, or expensive. Existing approaches rely on fitting deep models on outcomes observed for treated and control populations. However, when measuring individual outcomes is costly, as is the case of a tumor biopsy, a sample-efficient strategy for acquiring each result is required. Deep Bayesian active learning provides a framework for efficient data acquisition by selecting points with high uncertainty. However, existing methods bias training data acquisition towards regions of non-overlapping support between the treated and control populations. These are not sample-efficient because the treatment effect is not identifiable in such regions. We introduce causal, Bayesian acquisition functions grounded in information theory that bias data acquisition towards regions with overlapping support to maximize sample efficiency for learning personalized treatment effects. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed acquisition strategies on synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets IHDP and CMNIST and their extensions, which aim to simulate common dataset biases and pathologies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 52f8db33-3421-4f89-b037-2a799f95c729Cited by top-tier papers16
- GeneDisco: A Benchmark for Experimental Design in Drug DiscoveryArash Mehrjou, Ashkan Soleymani, Andrew Jesson, Pascal Notin et al.ICLR 2022 · 25 citations
- Sample Constrained Treatment Effect EstimationRaghavendra Addanki, David Arbour, Tung Mai, Cameron Musco et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Finite Population Regression Adjustment and Non-asymptotic Guarantees for Treatment Effect EstimationMehrdad Ghadiri, David Arbour, Tung Mai, Cameron Musco et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Online Decision MediationDaniel Jarrett, Alihan Hüyük, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2022 · 5 citations
- Task-specific experimental design for treatment effect estimationBethany Connolly, Kim Moore, Tobias Schwedes, Alexander Adam et al.ICML 2023 · 4 citations
Builds on6
- On Statistical Bias In Active Learning: How and When to Fix ItSebastian Farquhar, Yarin Gal, Tom RainforthICLR 2021 · 96 citations
- Identifying Causal-Effect Inference Failure with Uncertainty-Aware ModelsAndrew Jesson, Sören Mindermann, Uri Shalit, Yarin GalNeurIPS 2020 · 85 citations
- Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model EvaluationJannik Kossen, Sebastian Farquhar, Yarin Gal, Tom RainforthICML 2021 · 81 citations
- Quantifying Ignorance in Individual-Level Causal-Effect Estimates under Hidden ConfoundingAndrew Jesson, Sören Mindermann, Yarin Gal, Uri ShalitICML 2021 · 66 citations
- Budgeted Heterogeneous Treatment Effect EstimationTian Qin, Tian-Zuo Wang, Zhi-Hua ZhouICML 2021 · 18 citations
Related papers
- ActiveCQ: Active Estimation of Causal QuantitiesErdun Gao, Dino SejdinovicICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Causal-EPIG: Causally Aligned Active CATE EstimationErdun Gao, Jake Fawkes, Dino SejdinovicICML 2026 · 3 citations
- SEL-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Selective LabelsRuijiang Gao, Mingzhang Yin, Maytal Saar-TsechanskyNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Disentangled Multi-Fidelity Deep Bayesian Active LearningDongxia Wu, Ruijia Niu, Matteo Chinazzi, Yi-An Ma et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
- An Experimental Design Perspective on Model-Based Reinforcement LearningViraj Mehta, Biswajit Paria, Jeff Schneider, Stefano Ermon et al.ICLR 2022 · 24 citations
