Sample Constrained Treatment Effect Estimation
Raghavendra Addanki, David Arbour, Tung Mai, Cameron Musco, Anup Rao
Abstract
Treatment effect estimation is a fundamental problem in causal inference. We focus on designing efficient randomized controlled trials, to accurately estimate the effect of some treatment on a population of individuals. In particular, we study sample-constrained treatment effect estimation, where we must select a subset of individuals from the population to experiment on. This subset must be further partitioned into treatment and control groups. Algorithms for partitioning the entire population into treatment and control groups, or for choosing a single representative subset, have been well-studied. The key challenge in our setting is jointly choosing a representative subset and a partition for that set. We focus on both individual and average treatment effect estimation, under a linear effects model. We give provably efficient experimental designs and corresponding estimators, by identifying connections to discrepancy minimization and leverage-score-based sampling used in randomized numerical linear algebra. Our theoretical results obtain a smooth transition to known guarantees when equals the population size. We also empirically demonstrate the performance of our algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 39ce7a4c-eafc-48ea-809b-2f4aca14f656Cited by top-tier papers7
- Finite Population Regression Adjustment and Non-asymptotic Guarantees for Treatment Effect EstimationMehrdad Ghadiri, David Arbour, Tung Mai, Cameron Musco et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Task-specific experimental design for treatment effect estimationBethany Connolly, Kim Moore, Tobias Schwedes, Alexander Adam et al.ICML 2023 · 4 citations
- Causal-EPIG: Causally Aligned Active CATE EstimationErdun Gao, Jake Fawkes, Dino SejdinovicICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Observationally Informed Adaptive Causal Experimental DesignErdun Gao, Liang Zhang, Jake Fawkes, Aoqi Zuo et al.KDD 2026 · 1 citation
- Progressive Generalization Risk Reduction for Data-Efficient Causal Effect EstimationHechuan Wen, Tong Chen, Guanhua Ye, Li Kheng Chai et al.KDD 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational DataAndrew Jesson, Panagiotis Tigas, Joost van Amersfoort, Andreas Kirsch et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 42 citations
- Efficient Intervention Design for Causal Discovery with LatentsRaghavendra Addanki, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan, Andrew McGregor, Cameron MuscoICML 2020 · 34 citations
- Robust Pure Exploration in Linear Bandits with Limited BudgetAyya Alieva, Ashok Cutkosky, Abhimanyu DasICML 2021 · 27 citations
- Budgeted Heterogeneous Treatment Effect EstimationTian Qin, Tian-Zuo Wang, Zhi-Hua ZhouICML 2021 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Online Balanced Experimental DesignDavid Arbour, Drew Dimmery, Tung Mai, Anup B. RaoICML 2022 · 5 citations
- Fast Proxy Experiment Design for Causal Effect IdentificationSepehr Elahi, Sina Akbari, Jalal Etesami, Negar Kiyavash et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Reducing Confounding Bias without Data Splitting for Causal Inference via Optimal TransportYuguang Yan, Zongyu Li, Haolin Yang, Zeqin Yang et al.ICML 2025
- Good Allocations from Bad EstimatesSílvia Casacuberta, Moritz HardtICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- A/B Testing in Dense Large-Scale Networks: Design and InferencePreetam Nandy, Kinjal Basu, Shaunak Chatterjee, Ye TuNeurIPS 2020 · 19 citations
