Lune

S&P2017顶会

CRLite: A Scalable System for Pushing All TLS Revocations to All Browsers

James Larisch, David R. Choffnes, Dave Levin, Bruce M. Maggs, Alan Mislove, Christo Wilson

2017年份
105被引次数
19顶会引用

摘要

Currently, no major browser fully checks for TLS/SSL certificate revocations. This is largely due to the fact that the deployed mechanisms for disseminating revocations (CRLs, OCSP, OCSP Stapling, CRLSet, and OneCRL) are each either incomplete, insecure, inefficient, slow to update, not private, or some combination thereof. In this paper, we present CRLite, an efficient and easily-deployable system for proactively pushing all TLS certificate revocations to browsers. CRLite servers aggregate revocation information for all known, valid TLS certificates on the web, and store them in a space-efficient filter cascade data structure. Browsers periodically download and use this data to check for revocations of observed certificates in realtime. CRLite does not require any additional trust beyond the existing PKI, and it allows clients to adopt a fail-closed security posture even in the face of network errors or attacks that make revocation information temporarily unavailable. We present a prototype of CRLite that processes TLS certificates gathered by Rapid7, the University of Michigan, and Google's Certificate Transparency on the server-side, with a Firefox extension on the client-side. Comparing CRLite to an idealized browser that performs correct CRL/OCSP checking, we show that CRLite reduces latency and eliminates privacy concerns. Moreover, CRLite has low bandwidth costs: it can represent all certificates with an initial download of 10 MB (less than 1 byte per revocation) followed by daily updates of 580 KB on average. Taken together, our results demonstrate that complete TLS/SSL revocation checking is within reach for all clients. Recent measurement studies demonstrate that revocation is prevalent in the web's PKI [49] . More than 99% of valid certificates available on the web contain a reachable CRL URL, while 95% include a reachable OCSP responder. Liu et al. observe that 8% of all valid certificates are revoked (6% if we focus just on valid EV certificates) [49] , with the bulk of these revocations occurring due to Heartbleed [76], [19] .

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper19

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper4

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖