Keeping Authorities "Honest or Bust" with Decentralized Witness Cosigning
Ewa Syta, Iulia Tamas, Dylan Visher, David Isaac Wolinsky, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi, Bryan Ford
摘要
The secret keys of critical network authorities -- such as time, name, certificate, and software update services -- represent high-value targets for hackers, criminals, and spy agencies wishing to use these keys secretly to compromise other hosts. To protect authorities and their clients proactively from undetected exploits and misuse, we introduce CoSi, a scalable witness cosigning protocol ensuring that every authoritative statement is validated and publicly logged by a diverse group of witnesses before any client will accept it. A statement S collectively signed by W witnesses assures clients that S has been seen, and not immediately found erroneous, by those W observers. Even if S is compromised in a fashion not readily detectable by the witnesses, CoSi still guarantees S's exposure to public scrutiny, forcing secrecy-minded attackers to risk that the compromise will soon be detected by one of the W witnesses. Because clients can verify collective signatures efficiently without communication, CoSi protects clients' privacy, and offers the first transparency mechanism effective against persistent man-in-the-middle attackers who control a victim's Internet access, the authority's secret key, and several witnesses' secret keys. CoSi builds on existing cryptographic multisignature methods, scaling them to support thousands of witnesses via signature aggregation over efficient communication trees. A working prototype demonstrates CoSi in the context of timestamping and logging authorities, enabling groups of over 8,000 distributed witnesses to cosign authoritative statements in under two seconds.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper24
- OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via ShardingEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly 等S&P 2018 · 被引用 1,145 次
- Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective SigningEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi 等USENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 769 次
- Scalable Bias-Resistant Distributed RandomnessEwa Syta, Philipp Jovanovic, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Nicolas Gailly 等S&P 2017 · 被引用 327 次
- IKP: Turning a PKI Around with Decentralized Automated IncentivesStephanos Matsumoto, Raphael M. ReischukS&P 2017 · 被引用 168 次
- SANA: Secure and Scalable Aggregate Network AttestationMoreno Ambrosin, Mauro Conti, Ahmad Ibrahim, Gregory Neven 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 162 次
它引用的顶会 Paper2
- Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective SigningEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi 等USENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 769 次
- Attacking the Network Time ProtocolAanchal Malhotra, Isaac E. Cohen, Erik Brakke, Sharon GoldbergNDSS 2016 · 被引用 100 次
相关 Paper
- CTng: Secure Certificate and Revocation TransparencyJie Kong, James Damon, Hemi Leibowitz, Ewa Syta 等NDSS 2026 · 被引用 5 次
- Certificate Transparency in the Wild: Exploring the Reliability of MonitorsBingyu Li, Jingqiang Lin, Fengjun Li, Qiongxiao Wang 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 45 次
- On the Security of Two-Round Multi-SignaturesManu Drijvers, Kasra Edalatnejad, Bryan Ford, Eike Kiltz 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 126 次
- Locally Verifiable Signature and Key AggregationRishab Goyal, Vinod VaikuntanathanCRYPTO 2022 · 被引用 21 次
- Catena: Efficient Non-equivocation via BitcoinAlin Tomescu, Srinivas DevadasS&P 2017 · 被引用 144 次
