GPTScan: Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts by Combining GPT with Program Analysis
Yuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu, Haijun Wang, Zhengzi Xu, Xiaofei Xie, Yang Liu
摘要
Smart contracts are prone to various vulnerabilities, leading to substantial financial losses over time. Current analysis tools mainly target vulnerabilities with fixed control-or data-flow patterns, such as re-entrancy and integer overflow. However, a recent study on Web3 security bugs revealed that about 80% of these bugs cannot be audited by existing tools due to the lack of domain-specific property description and checking. Given recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), it is worth exploring how Generative Pre-training Transformer (GPT) could aid in detecting logic vulnerabilities. In this paper, we propose GPTScan, the first tool combining GPT with static analysis for smart contract logic vulnerability detection. Instead of relying solely on GPT to identify vulnerabilities, which can lead to high false positives and is limited by GPT's pre-trained knowledge, we utilize GPT as a versatile code understanding tool. By breaking down each logic vulnerability type into scenarios and properties, GPTScan matches candidate vulnerabilities with GPT. To enhance accuracy, GPTScan further instructs GPT to intelligently recognize key variables and statements, which are then validated by static confirmation. Evaluation on diverse datasets with around 400 contract projects and 3K Solidity files shows that GPTScan achieves high precision (over 90%) for token contracts and acceptable precision (57.14%) for large projects like Web3Bugs. It effectively detects ground-truth logic vulnerabilities with a recall of over 70%, including 9 new vulnerabilities missed by human auditors. GPTScan is fast and cost-effective, taking an average of 14.39 seconds and 0.01 USD to scan per thousand lines of Solidity code. Moreover, static confirmation helps GPTScan reduce two-thirds of false positives.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper41
- Enhancing Static Analysis for Practical Bug Detection: An LLM-Integrated ApproachHaonan Li, Yu Hao, Yizhuo Zhai, Zhiyun QianOOPSLA 2024 · 被引用 142 次
- Semantic Sleuth: Identifying Ponzi Contracts via Large Language ModelsCong Wu, Jing Chen, Ziwei Wang, Ruichao Liang 等ASE 2024 · 被引用 29 次
- Combining Fine-Tuning and LLM-Based Agents for Intuitive Smart Contract Auditing with JustificationsWei Ma, Daoyuan Wu, Yuqiang Sun, Tianwen Wang 等ICSE 2025 · 被引用 28 次
- Chasing Shadows: Pitfalls in LLM Security ResearchJonathan Evertz, Niklas Risse, Nicolai Neuer, Andreas Müller 等NDSS 2026 · 被引用 17 次
- Smart-LLaMA-DPO: Reinforced Large Language Model for Explainable Smart Contract Vulnerability DetectionLei Yu, Zhirong Huang, Hang Yuan, Shiqi Cheng 等ISSTA 2025 · 被引用 13 次
它引用的顶会 Paper20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 1,108 次
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 被引用 595 次
相关 Paper
- Have We Solved Access Control Vulnerability Detection in Smart Contracts? A Benchmark StudyHan Liu, Daoyuan Wu, Yuqiang Sun, Shuai Wang 等ASE 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Detecting Bugs with Substantial Monetary Consequences by LLM and Rule-based ReasoningBrian Zhang, Zhuo ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 12 次
- VeriExploit: Automatic Bug Reproduction in Smart Contracts via LLMs and Formal MethodsChenfeng Wei, Shiyu Cai, Yiannis Charalambous, Tong Wu 等ASE 2025
- Thought Is All You Need: Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection with Thought-Augmented Large Language ModelChaoyuan Peng, Muhui Jiang, Yajin Zhou, Lei WuFSE 2026
- PromFuzz: Leveraging LLM-Driven and Bug-Oriented Composite Analysis for Detecting Functional Bugs in Smart ContractsXingshuang Lin, Qinge Xie, Binbin Zhao, Yuan Tian 等ASE 2025 · 被引用 5 次
