Semantic Sleuth: Identifying Ponzi Contracts via Large Language Models
Cong Wu, Jing Chen, Ziwei Wang, Ruichao Liang, Ruiying Du
摘要
Smart contracts, self-executing agreements directly encoded in code, are fundamental to blockchain technology, especially in decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3. However, the rise of Ponzi schemes in smart contracts poses significant risks, leading to substantial financial losses and eroding trust in blockchain systems. Existing detection methods, such as PonziGuard, depend on large amounts of labeled data and struggle to identify unseen Ponzi schemes, limiting their reliability and generalizability. In contrast, we introduce PonziSleuth, the first LLM-driven approach for detecting Ponzi smart contracts, which requires no labeled training data. PonziSleuth utilizes advanced language understanding capabilities of LLMs to analyze smart contract source code through a novel two-step zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting technique. Our extensive evaluation on benchmark datasets and real-world contracts demonstrates that PonziSleuth delivers comparable, and often superior, performance without the extensive data requirements, achieving a balanced detection accuracy of 96.06% with GPT-3.5-turbo, 93.91% with LLAMA3, and 94.27% with Mistral. In real-world detection, PonziSleuth successfully identified 15 new Ponzi schemes from 4,597 contracts verified by Etherscan in March 2024, with a false negative rate of 0% and a false positive rate of 0.29%. These results highlight PonziSleuth's capability to detect diverse and novel Ponzi schemes, marking a significant advancement in leveraging LLMs for enhancing blockchain security and mitigating financial scams.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Chasing Shadows: Pitfalls in LLM Security ResearchJonathan Evertz, Niklas Risse, Nicolai Neuer, Andreas Müller 等NDSS 2026 · 被引用 17 次
- Reflections on the Reproducibility of Commercial LLM Performance in Empirical Software Engineering StudiesFlorian Angermeir, Maximilian Amougou, Mark Kreitz, Andreas Bauer 等ICSE 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Belobog: Move Language Fuzzing Framework for Real-World Smart ContractsZiqiao Kong, Wanxu Xia, Zhengwei Li, Yi Lu 等ISSTA 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 2,306 次
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 被引用 373 次
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 被引用 298 次
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 被引用 254 次
- GPTScan: Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts by Combining GPT with Program AnalysisYuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu 等ICSE 2024 · 被引用 131 次
相关 Paper
- PonziGuard: Detecting Ponzi Schemes on Ethereum with Contract Runtime Behavior Graph (CRBG)Ruichao Liang, Jing Chen, Kun He, Yueming Wu 等ICSE 2024 · 被引用 60 次
- Smart-LLaMA-DPO: Reinforced Large Language Model for Explainable Smart Contract Vulnerability DetectionLei Yu, Zhirong Huang, Hang Yuan, Shiqi Cheng 等ISSTA 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- OctopusGuard: K-Line Enhanced Token Scam Detector Powered by Multimodal LLMsLitong Sun, YangTian Mi, Xiapu Luo, Weigang WuICSE 2026
- Hyperion: Unveiling DApp Inconsistencies Using LLM and Dataflow-Guided Symbolic ExecutionShuo Yang, Xingwei Lin, Jiachi Chen, Qingyuan Zhong 等ICSE 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- The Deception Delta: Adversarial Evaluation of LLM-Based Smart Contract Bytecode ForensicsTimo SchefoldCCS 2026
