PromFuzz: Leveraging LLM-Driven and Bug-Oriented Composite Analysis for Detecting Functional Bugs in Smart Contracts
Xingshuang Lin, Qinge Xie, Binbin Zhao, Yuan Tian, Saman A. Zonouz, Na Ruan, Jiliang Li, Raheem Beyah, Shouling Ji
摘要
Smart contracts are fundamental pillars of the blockchain, playing a crucial role in facilitating various business transactions. However, these smart contracts are vulnerable to exploitable bugs that can lead to substantial monetary losses. A recent study reveals that over 80% of these exploitable bugs, which are primarily functional bugs, can evade the detection of current tools. Automatically identifying functional bugs in smart contracts presents challenges from multiple perspectives. The primary issue is the significant gap between understanding the high-level logic of the business model and checking the low-level implementations in smart contracts. Furthermore, identifying deeply rooted functional bugs in smart contracts requires the automated generation of effective detection oracles based on various bug features.To address these challenges, we design and implement PromFuzz, an automated and scalable system to detect functional bugs in smart contracts. In PromFuzz, we first propose a novel Large Language Model (LLM)-driven analysis framework, which leverages a dual-agent prompt engineering strategy to pinpoint potentially vulnerable functions for further scrutiny. We then implement a dual-stage coupling approach, which focuses on generating invariant checkers that leverage logic information extracted from potentially vulnerable functions. Finally, we design a bug-oriented fuzzing engine, which maps the logical information from the high-level business model to the low-level smart contract implementations, and performs the bug-oriented fuzzing on targeted functions. We evaluate PromFuzz from 4 perspectives on 5 ground-truth datasets and compare it with multiple state-of-the-art methods. The results show that PromFuzz achieves 86.96% recall and 93.02% F1-score in detecting functional bugs, marking at least a 50% improvement in both metrics over state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, we perform an in-depth analysis on 10 real-world DeFi projects and detect 30 zero-day bugs. Our further case studies, the risky first deposit bug and the AMM price oracle manipulation bug on real-world DeFi projects, demonstrate the serious risks of the exploitable functional bugs in smart contracts. Up to now, 24 zero-day bugs have been assigned CVE IDs. Our discoveries have safeguarded assets totaling $18.2 billion from potential monetary losses.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper23
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 2,306 次
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 1,108 次
相关 Paper
- Towards Finding Accounting Errors in Smart ContractsBrian ZhangICSE 2024 · 被引用 8 次
- Detecting Bugs with Substantial Monetary Consequences by LLM and Rule-based ReasoningBrian Zhang, Zhuo ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 12 次
- SmartInv: Multimodal Learning for Smart Contract Invariant InferenceSally Junsong Wang, Kexin Pei, Junfeng YangS&P 2024 · 被引用 38 次
- GPTScan: Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts by Combining GPT with Program AnalysisYuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu 等ICSE 2024 · 被引用 131 次
- EchoFuzz: Empowering Smart Contract Fuzzing with Large Language ModelsJuanen Li, Peng Qian, Guanyan Li, Rui Wang 等ICSE 2026
