TEE.Fail: Breaking Trusted Execution Environments via DDR5 Memory Bus Interposition
Jalen Chuang, Alexander Seto, Nicolás Berrios, Stephan van Schaik, Christina Garman, Daniel Genkin
摘要
Trusted execution environments (TEEs) aim to offer strong privacy and integrity guarantees even in the presence of root level attackers capable of arbitrarily modifying the system's software. Recently however, there has been a pivotal shift in TEE deployment, moving TEEs from enclaves running on PC-oriented hardware to confidential virtual machines executing on server-grade CPUs. Under the hood, this change has also resulted in significant modifications to the underlying memory encryption engine, removing integrity guarantees and protections against replay attacks. While Intel's and AMD's change in TEE implementation is clearly significant and substantial, most TEE deployments appear to fail to acknowledge the difference in security guarantees, assuming a stronger security model than truly afforded by the implementation. Thus, in this work we investigate the true protection offered by Intel's and AMD's newest TEE offerings against entry-level physical side-channel attacks. We show that, contrary to popular belief, bus interposition attacks on DDR5 server memory can be constructed cheaply by hobbyists, using parts easily obtained on e-commerce websites. Next, combining our ability to monitor DDR5 bus transactions with deterministic memory encryption used by Intel's SGX and TDX as well as AMD's SEV-SNP, we are able to extract secret key material (such as attestation keys in some cases) from machines in fully trusted status. Finally, we demonstrate the implications of our attacks on multiple real world TEE deployments.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper7
- SoK: Analysis of Accelerator TEE DesignsChenxu Wang, Junjie Huang, Yujun Liang, Xuanyao Peng 等NDSS 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- BreakFAST: Confused Deputy Attack on Infinity Fabric to Break AMD SEV-SNPPhilipp Giersfeld, Benedict Schlüter, Shweta ShindeS&P 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Hoss: Fast Oblivious Semantic Search with Heterogeneous GPU-CPU-TEE ArchitectureJianzhang Du, Weijie Huang, Chenghong Wang, Nicolas Tsagareli 等CCS 2026
- STALEUS: Breaking AMD SEV-SNP via Memory IncoherenceBenedict Schlüter, Shweta ShindeUSENIX Security 2026
- DDRop: Active Memory Interposer Attacks on Confidential VMs by Dropping DDR5 WritesJesse De Meulemeester, Stefan Gloor, Patrick Jattke, Daniel Moghimi 等CCS 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper27
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,175 次
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 607 次
- DRAMA: Exploiting DRAM Addressing for Cross-CPU AttacksPeter Pessl, Daniel Gruss, Clémentine Maurice, Michael Schwarz 等USENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 500 次
- ZombieLoad: Cross-Privilege-Boundary Data SamplingMichael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp, Daniel Moghimi, Jo Van Bulck 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 464 次
- Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Arthur GervaisS&P 2022 · 被引用 336 次
相关 Paper
- BadRAM: Practical Memory Aliasing Attacks on Trusted Execution EnvironmentsJesse De Meulemeester, Luca Wilke, David F. Oswald, Thomas Eisenbarth 等S&P 2025
- Battering RAM: Low-Cost Interposer Attacks on Confidential Computing via Dynamic Memory AliasingJesse De Meulemeester, David F. Oswald, Ingrid Verbauwhede, Jo Van BulckS&P 2026 · 被引用 20 次
- On (the Lack of) Code Confidentiality in Trusted Execution EnvironmentsIvan Puddu, Moritz Schneider, Daniele Lain, Stefano Boschetto 等S&P 2024 · 被引用 14 次
- vSGX: Virtualizing SGX Enclaves on AMD SEVShixuan Zhao, Mengyuan Li, Yinqian Zhang, Zhiqiang LinS&P 2022 · 被引用 32 次
- HECKLER: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious InterruptsBenedict Schlüter, Supraja Sridhara, Mark Kuhne, Andrin Bertschi 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 48 次
