DDRop: Active Memory Interposer Attacks on Confidential VMs by Dropping DDR5 Writes
Jesse De Meulemeester, Stefan Gloor, Patrick Jattke, Daniel Moghimi, David Oswald, Martin Thompson, Kaveh Razavi, Ingrid Verbauwhede, Jo Van Bulck
摘要
Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) are increasingly deployed in the cloud to protect sensitive workloads through hardware-enforced isolation, remote attestation, and transparent memory encryption. However, to meet memory performance and size demands , modern TEEs omit cryptographic freshness guarantees, leaving them vulnerable to replay attacks by adversaries with physical memory access. Prior work demonstrated low-cost active inter-position attacks on DDR4 without requiring expensive specialized equipment, but these techniques do not extend to DDR5, where existing approaches are limited to passive ciphertext side-channel analysis and rely on bus downclocking to accommodate legacy memory bus analyzers. We present the first low-cost (<200$) DDR5 RDIMM interposer capable of active fault injection at native speeds. By injecting targeted parity errors to silently discard cache line writebacks, we introduce DDRop, a new primitive that exploits the absence of cryptographic freshness to break the integrity of Intel TDX, Scalable SGX, and AMD SEV-SNP. Building on this primitive and targeting the APIs exposed by the TDX module and AMD Secure Processor, we show that adversaries can gain ciphertext access, copy arbitrary victim pages, and inject malicious secure page-table entries. We demonstrate end-to-end attacks on an up-to-date TDX platform, including forcing any TD into debug mode and forging attestation reports. While software-level mitigations, including timing-based interposer detection and API hardening, may reduce the attack surface , our results demonstrate that active DDR5 bus interposition is practical at low cost, highlighting the need for robust cryptographic memory integrity protections against physical adversaries. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CCS '26, • Security and privacy → Hardware attacks and countermeasures .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper19
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 369 次
- CIPHERLEAKS: Breaking Constant-time Cryptography on AMD SEV via the Ciphertext Side ChannelMengyuan Li, Yinqian Zhang, Huibo Wang, Kang Li 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 130 次
- VoltPillager: Hardware-based fault injection attacks against Intel SGX Enclaves using the SVID voltage scaling interfaceZitai Chen, Georgios Vasilakis, Kit Murdock, Edward Dean 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 127 次
- A Systematic Look at Ciphertext Side Channels on AMD SEV-SNPMengyuan Li, Luca Wilke, Jan Wichelmann, Thomas Eisenbarth 等S&P 2022 · 被引用 87 次
- CacheWarp: Software-based Fault Injection using Selective State ResetRuiyi Zhang, Lukas Gerlach, Daniel Weber, Lorenz Hetterich 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 36 次
相关 Paper
- TEE.Fail: Breaking Trusted Execution Environments via DDR5 Memory Bus InterpositionJalen Chuang, Alexander Seto, Nicolás Berrios, Stephan van Schaik 等S&P 2026 · 被引用 29 次
- Battering RAM: Low-Cost Interposer Attacks on Confidential Computing via Dynamic Memory AliasingJesse De Meulemeester, David F. Oswald, Ingrid Verbauwhede, Jo Van BulckS&P 2026 · 被引用 20 次
- BadRAM: Practical Memory Aliasing Attacks on Trusted Execution EnvironmentsJesse De Meulemeester, Luca Wilke, David F. Oswald, Thomas Eisenbarth 等S&P 2025
- TDXploit: Novel Techniques for Single-Stepping and Cache Attacks on Intel TDXFabian Rauscher, Luca Wilke, Hannes Weissteiner, Thomas Eisenbarth 等USENIX Security 2025
- HECKLER: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious InterruptsBenedict Schlüter, Supraja Sridhara, Mark Kuhne, Andrin Bertschi 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 48 次
