Timelines: A World-Building Activity for Values Advocacy
Richmond Y. Wong, Tonya Nguyen
Abstract
This paper presents Timelines, a design activity to assist values advocates: people who help others recognize values and ethical concerns as relevant to technical practice. Rather than integrate seamlessly into existing design processes, Timelines aims to create a space for critical reflection and contestation among expert participants (such as technology researchers, practitioners, or students) and a values advocate facilitator to surface the importance and relevance of values and ethical concerns. The activity’s design is motivated by theoretical perspectives from design fiction, scenario planning, and value sensitive design. The activity helps participants surface discussion of broad societal-level changes related to a technology by creating stories from news headlines, and recognize a diversity of experiences situated in the everyday by creating social media posts from different viewpoints. We reflect on how decisions on the activity’s design and facilitation enables it to assist in values advocacy practices.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for SupportMichael Madaio, Lisa Egede, Hariharan Subramonyam, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CSCW 2022 · 149 citations
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI ChallengesQiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun K. Kane, Shivani Kapania et al.CHI 2023 · 90 citations
- Tactics of Soft Resistance in User Experience Professionals' Values WorkRichmond Y. WongCSCW 2021 · 81 citations
- Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application PrototypingZijie J. Wang, Chinmay Kulkarni, Lauren Wilcox, Michael Terry et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
- Supporting Industry Computing Researchers in Assessing, Articulating, and Addressing the Potential Negative Societal Impact of Their WorkWesley Hanwen Deng, Solon Barocas, Jennifer Wortman VaughanCSCW 2025 · 8 citations
Builds on3
- Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AIMichael A. Madaio, Luke Stark, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. WallachCHI 2020 · 428 citations
- Expanding Modes of Reflection in Design FuturingSandjar Kozubaev, Chris Elsden, Noura Howell, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard et al.CHI 2020 · 171 citations
- Infrastructural Speculations: Tactics for Designing and Interrogating LifeworldsRichmond Y. Wong, Vera D. Khovanskaya, Sarah E. Fox, Nick Merrill et al.CHI 2020 · 84 citations
Related papers
- Using Design Fiction Memos to Analyze UX Professionals' Values Work Practices: A Case Study Bridging Ethnographic and Design Futuring MethodsRichmond Y. WongCHI 2021 · 33 citations
- What Happened to Scenario-Based Design in HCI?: A Scoping ReviewJohn M. Carroll, Jeongwon Jo, Jiyoon Kim, Ya-Fang Lin et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Guidelines for Integrating Value Sensitive Design in Responsible AI ToolkitsMalak Sadek, Marios Constantinides, Daniele Quercia, Céline MougenotCHI 2024 · 49 citations
- Scenario Co-Creation Cards: A Culturally Sensitive Tool for Eliciting ValuesTaghreed Alshehri, Reuben Kirkham, Patrick OlivierCHI 2020 · 31 citations
- How Does My Time Use Align With My Values? Personal Informatics for Connecting Abstract Values to Everyday LifeMichael J. Hoefer, Raegan Rychecky, Stephen VoidaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
