On the Exploitability of Instruction Tuning
Manli Shu, Jiongxiao Wang, Chen Zhu, Jonas Geiping, Chaowei Xiao, Tom Goldstein
Abstract
Instruction tuning is an effective technique to align large language models (LLMs) with human intents. In this work, we investigate how an adversary can exploit instruction tuning by injecting specific instruction-following examples into the training data that intentionally changes the model's behavior. For example, an adversary can achieve content injection by injecting training examples that mention target content and eliciting such behavior from downstream models. To achieve this goal, we propose AutoPoison, an automated data poisoning pipeline. It naturally and coherently incorporates versatile attack goals into poisoned data with the help of an oracle LLM. We showcase two example attacks: content injection and over-refusal attacks, each aiming to induce a specific exploitable behavior. We quantify and benchmark the strength and the stealthiness of our data poisoning scheme. Our results show that AutoPoison allows an adversary to change a model's behavior by poisoning only a small fraction of data while maintaining a high level of stealthiness in the poisoned examples. We hope our work sheds light on how data quality affects the behavior of instruction-tuned models and raises awareness of the importance of data quality for responsible deployments of LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/azshue/AutoPoison.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ff5f2fdf-5899-4e1d-ad21-1c2639d5aa94Cited by top-tier papers43
- Exploiting LLM QuantizationKazuki Egashira, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Jingxuan He et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 104 citations
- Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM AdaptationDanny Halawi, Alexander Wei, Eric Wallace, Tony Tong Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 77 citations
- Shadowcast: Stealthy Data Poisoning Attacks Against Vision-Language ModelsYuancheng Xu, Jiarui Yao, Manli Shu, Yanchao Sun et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 67 citations
- NLSR: Neuron-Level Safety Realignment of Large Language Models Against Harmful Fine-TuningXin Yi, Shunfan Zheng, Linlin Wang, Gerard de Melo et al.AAAI 2025 · 38 citations
- Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction TuningHang Zhou, Yehui Tang, Haochen Qin, Yujie Yang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
Builds on20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
Related papers
- Poisoning Language Models During Instruction TuningAlexander Wan, Eric Wallace, Sheng Shen, Dan KleinICML 2023 · 319 citations
- Merging Triggers, Breaking Backdoors: Defensive Poisoning for Instruction-Tuned Language ModelsSan Kim, Gary LeeACL 2026
- PoisonBench: Assessing Language Model Vulnerability to Poisoned Preference DataTingchen Fu, Mrinank Sharma, Philip Torr, Shay B. Cohen et al.ICML 2025
- MetaPoison: Practical General-purpose Clean-label Data PoisoningW. Ronny Huang, Jonas Geiping, Liam Fowl, Gavin Taylor et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 242 citations
- Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow InstructionsFederico Bianchi, Mirac Suzgun, Giuseppe Attanasio, Paul Röttger et al.ICLR 2024 · 373 citations
