Merging Triggers, Breaking Backdoors: Defensive Poisoning for Instruction-Tuned Language Models
San Kim, Gary Lee
Abstract
Warning: This paper contains examples that may be offensive or upsetting. Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly through instruction tuning, which enables broad task generalization without additional fine-tuning. However, their reliance on large-scale datasets-often collected from human or web sources-makes them vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where adversaries poison a small subset of data to implant hidden behaviors. Despite this growing risk, defenses for instruction-tuned models remain underexplored. We propose MB-Defense (Merging & Breaking Defense Framework), a novel training pipeline that immunizes instruction-tuned LLMs against diverse backdoor threats. MB-Defense comprises two stages: (i) Defensive Poisoning, which merges attacker and defensive triggers into a unified backdoor representation, and (ii) Backdoor Neutralization, which breaks this representation through additional training to restore clean behavior. Extensive experiments across multiple LLMs show that MB-Defense substantially lowers attack success rates while preserving instruction-following ability. Our method offers a generalizable and data-efficient defense strategy, improving the robustness of instruction-tuned LLMs against unseen backdoor attacks. Code, data, and implementation details are publicly available at https: //github.com/mountinyy/MB-Defense .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cfc72d68-115a-4714-a4e0-00cabf37808eBuilds on18
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing InstructionsSwaroop Mishra, Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, Hannaneh HajishirziACL 2022 · 887 citations
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
Related papers
- Backdoor Collapse: Eliminating Unknown Threats Via Known Backdoor Aggregation In Language ModelsLiang Lin, Miao Yu, Moayad Aloqaily, Zhenhong Zhou et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Purifying Generative LLMs from Backdoors without Prior Knowledge or Clean ReferenceJianwei Li, Jung-Eun KimICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Lethe: Purifying Backdoored Large Language Models with Knowledge DilutionChen Chen, Yuchen Sun, Jiaxin Gao, Xueluan Gong et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- LT-Defense: Searching-free Backdoor Defense via Exploiting the Long-tailed EffectYixiao Xu, Binxing Fang, Mohan Li, Keke Tang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- MTAttack: Multi-Target Backdoor Attacks Against Large Vision-Language ModelsZihan Wang, Guansong Pang, Wenjun Miao, Jin Zheng et al.AAAI 2026
