Order Selection Prophet Inequality: From Threshold Optimization to Arrival Time Design
Bo Peng, Zhihao Gavin Tang
Abstract
In the classical prophet inequality, a gambler faces a sequence of items, whose values are drawn independently from known distributions. Upon the arrival of each item, its value is realized and the gambler either accepts it and the game ends, or irrevocably rejects it and continues to the next item. The goal is to maximize the value of the selected item and compete against the expected maximum value of all items. A tight competitive ratio of is established in the classical setting and various relaxations have been proposed to surpass the barrier, including the i.i.d. model, the order selection model, and the random order model. In this paper, we advance the study of the order selection prophet inequality, in which the gambler is given the extra power for selecting the arrival order of the items. Our main result is a 0.725-competitive algorithm, that substantially improves the state-of-the-art 0.669 ratio by Correa, Saona and Ziliotto (Math. Program. 2021), achieved in the harder random order model. Recently, Agrawal, Sethuraman and Zhang (EC 2020) proved that the task of selecting the optimal order is NP-hard. Despite this fact, we introduce a novel algorithm design framework that translates the discrete order selection problem into a continuous arrival time design problem. From this perspective, we can focus on the arrival time design without worrying about the threshold optimization afterwards. As a side result, we achieve the optimal 0.745 competitive ratio by applying our algorithm to the i.i.d. model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ff23f833-eddb-43cc-bf7d-cfb5ce5c7931Cited by top-tier papers10
- "Who is Next in Line?" On the Significance of Knowing the Arrival Order in Bayesian Online SettingsTomer Ezra, Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Zhihao Gavin TangSODA 2023 · 7 citations
- Beyond Regularity: Simple versus Optimal Mechanisms, RevisitedYiding Feng, Yaonan JinFOCS 2025 · 6 citations
- Prophet Inequalities Require Only a Constant Number of SamplesAndrés Cristi, Bruno ZiliottoSTOC 2024 · 6 citations
- Set Covering with Our Eyes Wide ShutAnupam Gupta, Gregory Kehne, Roie LevinSODA 2024 · 3 citations
- Lookback Prophet InequalitiesZiyad Benomar, Dorian Baudry, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Prophet Secretary and Matching: the Significance of the Largest ItemZiyun Chen, Zhiyi Huang, Dongchen Li, Zhihao Gavin TangSODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Prophet Inequalities: Competing with the Top ℓ Items is EasyMathieu Molina, Nicolas Gast, Patrick Loiseau, Vianney PerchetSODA 2025
- Prophet Inequality from Samples: Is the More the Merrier?Tomer EzraSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- Prophet Inequalities with Cancellation CostsFarbod Ekbatani, Rad Niazadeh, Pranav Nuti, Jan VondrákSTOC 2024 · 6 citations
- Minimization is Harder in the Prophet WorldVasilis Livanos, Ruta MehtaSODA 2024 · 2 citations
