Lookback Prophet Inequalities
Ziyad Benomar, Dorian Baudry, Vianney Perchet
Abstract
Prophet inequalities are fundamental optimal stopping problems, where a decision-maker observes sequentially items with values sampled independently from known distributions, and must decide at each new observation to either stop and gain the current value or reject it irrevocably and move to the next step. This model is often too pessimistic and does not adequately represent real-world online selection processes. Potentially, rejected items can be revisited and a fraction of their value can be recovered. To analyze this problem, we consider general decay functions , quantifying the value to be recovered from a rejected item, depending on how far it has been observed in the past. We analyze how lookback improves, or not, the competitive ratio in prophet inequalities in different order models. We show that, under mild monotonicity assumptions on the decay functions, the problem can be reduced to the case where all the decay functions are equal to the same function , where . Consequently, we focus on this setting and refine the analyses of the competitive ratios, with upper and lower bounds expressed as increasing functions of .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cf02c9a6-47b8-44da-9951-ef926f22cab9Cited by top-tier papers3
- Addressing Bias in Online Selection with Limited Budget of ComparisonsZiyad Benomar, Evgenii Chzhen, Nicolas Schreuder, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Sequential Selling with Sunk Cost BiasYasushi Kawase, Tomohiro NakayoshiAAAI 2026
- Learning in Prophet Inequalities with Noisy ObservationsJung-hun Kim, Vianney PerchetICLR 2026
Builds on28
- Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned AdviceAntonios Antoniadis, Themis Gouleakis, Pieter Kleer, Pavel KolevNeurIPS 2020 · 167 citations
- Faster Matchings via Learned DualsMichael Dinitz, Sungjin Im, Thomas Lavastida, Benjamin Moseley et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 98 citations
- Faster Fundamental Graph Algorithms via Learned PredictionsJustin Y. Chen, Sandeep Silwal, Ali Vakilian, Fred ZhangICML 2022 · 58 citations
- Learning Augmented Binary Search TreesHonghao Lin, Tian Luo, David P. WoodruffICML 2022 · 46 citations
- Learning Online Algorithms with Distributional AdviceIlias Diakonikolas, Vasilis Kontonis, Christos Tzamos, Ali Vakilian et al.ICML 2021 · 44 citations
Related papers
- Prophet Inequalities: Competing with the Top ℓ Items is EasyMathieu Molina, Nicolas Gast, Patrick Loiseau, Vianney PerchetSODA 2025
- Prophet Inequalities with Cancellation CostsFarbod Ekbatani, Rad Niazadeh, Pranav Nuti, Jan VondrákSTOC 2024 · 6 citations
- Prophet Inequalities Require Only a Constant Number of SamplesAndrés Cristi, Bruno ZiliottoSTOC 2024 · 6 citations
- Minimization is Harder in the Prophet WorldVasilis Livanos, Ruta MehtaSODA 2024 · 2 citations
- Order Selection Prophet Inequality: From Threshold Optimization to Arrival Time DesignBo Peng, Zhihao Gavin TangFOCS 2022 · 12 citations
