Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned Advice
Antonios Antoniadis, Themis Gouleakis, Pieter Kleer, Pavel Kolev
Abstract
The classical analysis of online algorithms, due to its worst-case nature, can be quite pessimistic when the input instance at hand is far from worst-case. Often this is not an issue with machine learning approaches, which shine in exploiting patterns in past inputs in order to predict the future. However, such predictions, although usually accurate, can be arbitrarily poor. Inspired by a recent line of work, we augment three well-known online settings with machine learned predictions about the future, and develop algorithms that take them into account. In particular, we study the following online selection problems: (i) the classical secretary problem, (ii) online bipartite matching and (iii) the graphic matroid secretary problem. Our algorithms still come with a worst-case performance guarantee in the case that predictions are subpar while obtaining an improved competitive ratio (over the best-known classical online algorithm for each problem) when the predictions are sufficiently accurate. For each algorithm, we establish a trade-off between the competitive ratios obtained in the two respective cases.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dddd70cc-45ea-4643-aa3a-fb54239bf1d1Cited by top-tier papers70
- Online metric algorithms with untrusted predictionsAntonios Antoniadis, Christian Coester, Marek Eliás, Adam Polak et al.ICML 2020 · 170 citations
- Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online AlgorithmsAlexander Wei, Fred ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 129 citations
- Online Knapsack with Frequency PredictionsSungjin Im, Ravi Kumar, Mahshid Montazer Qaem, Manish PurohitNeurIPS 2021 · 70 citations
- Faster Fundamental Graph Algorithms via Learned PredictionsJustin Y. Chen, Sandeep Silwal, Ali Vakilian, Fred ZhangICML 2022 · 58 citations
- Learning Online Algorithms with Distributional AdviceIlias Diakonikolas, Vasilis Kontonis, Christos Tzamos, Ali Vakilian et al.ICML 2021 · 44 citations
Builds on4
- Near-Optimal Bounds for Online Caching with Machine Learned AdviceDhruv RohatgiSODA 2020 · 88 citations
- Online Scheduling via Learned WeightsSilvio Lattanzi, Thomas Lavastida, Benjamin Moseley, Sergei VassilvitskiiSODA 2020 · 83 citations
- Competitive Analysis with a Sample and the Secretary ProblemHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2020 · 26 citations
- The Two-Sided Game of Googol and Sample-Based Prophet InequalitiesJosé R. Correa, Andrés Cristi, Boris Epstein, José A. SotoSODA 2020 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Online Selection Problems against Constrained AdversaryZhihao Jiang, Pinyan Lu, Zhihao Gavin Tang, Yuhao ZhangICML 2021 · 16 citations
- Ordinal Secretaries with AdviceHasti Nourmohammadi Sigaroudi, Ying Cao, Bo Sun, Xiaoqi TanAAAI 2026
- Fair Secretaries with Unfair PredictionsEric Balkanski, Will Ma, Andreas MaggioriNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Advice Querying under Budget Constraint for Online AlgorithmsZiyad Benomar, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Learning Predictions for Algorithms with PredictionsMisha Khodak, Maria-Florina Balcan, Ameet Talwalkar, Sergei VassilvitskiiNeurIPS 2022 · 40 citations
